Wyniki wyszukiwania:

During the middle of the twentieth century, the religiously informed communitarianism that had guided the Supreme Court's decisions regarding the relationship between church and state was partially displaced by a new secular individualist discourse. In "The Rhetoric of Church and State," Frederick Mark Gedicks argues that this partial and incomplete shift is the key to understanding why the Court has failed--and continues today to fail--to provide a coherent doctrine on church/state separation.
Gedicks suggests that the Supreme Court's inconsistent decisions mirror a divergence in American...

During the middle of the twentieth century, the religiously informed communitarianism that had guided the Supreme Court's decisions regarding the relationship between church and state was partially displaced by a new secular individualist discourse. In "The Rhetoric of Church and State," Frederick Mark Gedicks argues that this partial and incomplete shift is the key to understanding why the Court has failed--and continues today to fail--to provide a coherent doctrine on church/state separation.
Gedicks suggests that the Supreme Court's inconsistent decisions mirror a divergence in American...