1 Introduction: The Charlie Hebdo Affair as a Global “Meta-Media Event”
Part I Theoretical and Historical Approaches
2 Journalistic (Battle)fields, Cultures, Mentalities, and Proximities
3 Charlie Hebdo and French Collective Memory: Origins of the Right to Caricature
4 Genesis of the Charlie Hebdo Affair: The Clash of Human Rights and Religious Rites
Part II The Charlie Hebdo Affair: Case Studies in Journalism and Comparative Establishmentalities
5 The Charlie Hebdo Affair, Freedom of Expression, and Apologia for Terrorism Under French Law
6 The Charlie Hebdo Terrorist Attack and European Journalistic Solidarity (with Lea Hellmueller)
7 The Charlie Hebdo Affair in the Journalistic Field of the United Kingdom
8 The Charlie Hebdo Affair in Turkey: Balancing Human Rights and Religious Rites
9 The Charlie Hebdo Affair and the Right to Take Offense: Religious Sensibilities Versus Freedom of Expression in India
10 The Charlie Hebdo Affair in Three African Journalistic Fields
11 The Charlie Hebdo Affair and Transnational Solidarity in three Journalistic Battle(fields) of Latin America
12 The Charlie Hebdo Affair in the American Journalistic Field
13 One Country, Two Journalistic Cultures: The Charlie Hebdo Affair in the Bi-cultural Journalistic Field of Canada
14 Afterword and Afterthoughts
Lyombe Eko is a Professor of Comparative and International Communication at the College of Media and Communication, Texas Tech University. He earned his doctorate degree in Journalism from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. He has been a Professor at the University of Maine and Director of Graduate Studies at the University of Iowa School of Journalism. He has published three other books on media law and international communication, including New Media, Old Regimes: Case Studies in Comparative Communication Law and Policy, which won the Gold Media at the Independent Publishers’ Book Awards in 2014.
The Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack of January 7, 2015 shook French journalism to the core and reverberated around the world, triggering a cascade of responses from journalists, media outlets, cartoonists and caricaturists from diverse geographies of freedom of expression and journalistic cultures.
This book is a multifaceted case study that describes and explains sameness and difference in diverse journalistic conceptualizations of the Charlie Hebdo affair from a comparative, international perspective. It explores how different journalistic traditions, cultures, worldviews and styles conceptualized and reacted to the clash between freedom of expression and respect for religious sentiments in the context of terrorism, where those sentiments are imposed on the media and secular societies through intimidation, coercion and violence. The book analyzes the political and cultural clashes between the core human right of freedom of expression, and rite of respect for religious sentiments, which is situated on the outer periphery of the human right of freedom of religion. It also examines how media outlets, editors, and cartoonists from different politico-cultural contexts and journalistic cultures in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North and South America, addressed the delicate issue of Mohammed cartoons in general, and the problem of (re)publication of the controversial Charlie Hebdo Je Suis Charlie Mohammed cartoon, in particular.