Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism Revisited

ISBN-13: 9783031052255 / Angielski / Twarda / 2022 / 316 str.

Spis treści

1. Introduction

2. Conservatism and Social Criticism: Pascal on Faith, Reason, and Politics

3. Giambattista Vico and Democratic Pluralism: Lessons for Deliberative Democracy

4. A Modest Spinozist: George Eliot and the Limits of Rationalism

5. Projections Upon the Void: Irving Babbitt’s Critique of Naturalism

6. Carl Schmitt's Exceptional Critique of Rationalism

7. Moral Man in a Morally Irrational World: Max Weber and the Limits of Reason

8. The Moral Personality of Mikhail Bulgakov

9. Nec Spe Nec Metu: Philosophic Catharsis in Karl Löwith’s Meaning in History

10. Metaphor, Meaning, and Mind: Knowledge and Imagination in Owen Barfield

11. Rings and Rationalism: Tolkien’s Tales Against Domination

12. Shedding the Shackles of Rationalism

13. Beautiful Minds: Gregory Bateson on Ecology, Insanity, and Wisdom

14. Robert Nisbet: Art, History, and the Anti-Rationalism of Sociological Methodology

15. Elizabeth Anscombe on Rationalism

16. A.C. Graham on Rationalism, Irrationalism, and Anti-Rationalism (“Aware Spontaneity”)

17. Intention, Intellect, and Imagination: Stuart Hampshire’s Pluralism

18. Rationality and Tradition in Roger Scruton’s Thought

19. A Counter-Enlightenment of the Present: A Defense of John Grays'  Modus Vivendi Liberalism

O autorze

Gene Callahan teaches at New York University. He is the author of Economics for Real People (2002), Oakeshott on Rome and America (2012), and co-editor of Tradition v. Rationalism (2018).

Kenneth B. McIntyre is Professor of Political Science at Sam Houston State University.  He is the author of The Limits of Political Theory: Michael Oakeshott on Civil Association (2004), Herbert Butterfield: History, Providence, and Skeptical Politics (2012), and Nomocratic Pluralism: Plural Values, Negative Liberty, and the Rule of Law (2021), and co-editor of Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism (2021).

Blurb

This book provides an overview of some of the most important critics of “Enlightenment rationalism.” The subjects of the volume (including, among others, Pascal, Vico, Schmitt, Weber, Anscombe, Scruton, and Tolkien) do not share a philosophical tradition as much as a skeptical disposition toward the notion, common among modern thinkers, that there is only one standard of rationality or reasonableness, and that that one standard is or ought to be taken from the presuppositions, methods, and logic of the natural sciences.

The essays on each thinker are intended not merely to offer a commentary on that thinker, but also to place the person in the context of this larger stream of anti-rationalist thought.