Conceptions and Consequences of Mathematical Argumentation, Justification, and Proof

ISBN-13: 9783030800079 / Angielski / Twarda / 2022 / 402 str.

Kristen N. Bieda; Annamarie Conner; Karl W. Kosko

Spis treści

Table of Contents

 

 

Introduction: Conceptualizing Argumentation, Justification, and Proof in Mathematics Education

Megan Staples & AnnaMarie Conner

 

Part 1: Argumentation, Justification and Proof in an Elementary Classroom

 

Overview of the Elementary Level Data

Karl W. Kosko

 

Argumentation in the Elementary Grades: The Role of Participants, Tasks, and Tools

Chepina Rumsey, Ian Whitacre, Şebnem Atabaş,& Jessica L. Smith

 

Justification in the Elementary Grades: Justification to Develop and Provide Access to Mathematical Reasoning

Eva Thanheiser & Amanda Sugimoto

 

Proof in the Elementary Grades: A Multimodal Approach to Generalization and Proof

Candace Walkington & Dawn Woods

 

On the Meanings of Argumentation, Justification, and Proof: General Insights from Analyses of Elementary Classroom Episodes

Andreas J. Stylianides & Gabriel J. Stylianides

 

 

Part 2: Argumentation, Justification and Proof in a Middle Grades Classroom

 

Overview of Middle Level Data

Megan Staples

 

Argumentation in the Middle Grades: Exploring a Teacher’s Support of Collective Argumentation

Carolos Nicolas Gomez, Stacy R. Jones, & Hilary Tanck

 

Justification in the Middle Grades: A Process of Verification and Sense-Making

Kristin Lesseig & Jerilynn Lepak

 

Proof in the Middle Grades: Can we Label Middle Grades Arguments as Proof with a Capital P?

David A. Yopp, Rob Ely, Anne E. Adams, & Annelise W. Nielsen

 

Argumentation, Justification, and Proof in Middle School: A Rose by Any Other Name

Eric Knuth, Orit Zaslavsky, & Hangil Kim

 

 

Part 3: Argumentation, Justification and Proof in High School Mathematics

 

Overview of High School Level Data

AnnaMarie Conner

 

Argumentation in the Context of High School Mathematics: Examining Dialogic Aspects of Argumentation

Markus Hähkiöniemi

 

Justification in the Context of High School Mathematics: Co-Constructing Content and Process

Jill Newton

 

Proof in the Context of High School Mathematics: A First Approach through Discussion, with Occasions and Missed Opportunities

Francesca Morselli

 

Reasoning is in the Eye of the Lens-Holder: Observations Made through the Lenses of Justification, Argumentation, and Proof at the High School Level

Michelle Cirillo & Dana C. Cox

 

 

Part 4: Argumentation, Justification and Proof at the Tertiary Level

 

Overview of Tertiary Level Data

David Plaxco

 

Argumentation in the Context of Tertiary Mathematics: A Case Study of Classroom Argumentation and the Role of Instructor Moves

David Plaxco & Megan Wawro

 

Justification in the Context of Tertiary Mathematics: Undergraduate Students Exploring the Properties and Relations of the Dihedral Group

Shiv Smith Karunakaran & Mariana Levin

 

Proof in the Context of Tertiary Mathematics: Undergraduate Inquiry-Based Learning in Abstract Algebra as a Precursor to Mathematical Proof

Timothy Fyukawa-Connelly & Sera Karahoca

 

Mathematics Educators as Polymaths, Brokers, and Learners: Commentary on the Tertiary Chapters on Argumentation, Justification, and Proof

Paul Christian Dawkins

 

Part 5: Lenses on Researching Argumentation, Justification and Proof Across the Grade Levels

 

Participation in Argumentation: Teacher and Student Roles across the Grades

AnnaMarie Conner

 

Justification Across the Grade Bands

Amy Ellis, Megan Staples, & Kristen N. Bieda

 

Lens, Blinders, or Kaleidoscope? Using a Definition of Proof to Make Sense of Classroom Activity

Sean Larsen & Tenchita Alzaga Elizondo

 

Conclusion: Considering the Consequences of Our Conceptions of Argumentation, Justification, and Proof

Karl W. Kosko & Kristen N. Bieda

O autorze

Kristen Bieda is an associate professor of Teacher Education and Mathematics Education at Michigan State University. She also holds an appointment as the Associate Director of Mathematics for the CREATE for STEM Institute. Prior to her appointment at Michigan State, she taught mathematics at the middle school, high school and community college levels. Her research interests include understanding how to incorporate mathematical justification into school mathematics, particularly at the middle school level. She is also interested in the design of clinical experiences that support prospective teachers in learning to teach ambitiously. She is currently the subject area leader for secondary mathematics for Michigan State’s secondary mathematics teacher preparation program.

AnnaMarie Conner is a professor of Mathematics Education in the Mary Frances Early College of Education at the University of Georgia. She investigates teachers’ beliefs and identity construction during teacher education and how teachers learn to support collective argumentation in mathematics classes. These two lines of research come together in findings describing how teachers’ beliefs impact their classroom practice with respect to collective argumentation. Dr. Conner’s work investigates the complex connections between teacher education, teacher characteristics, and teacher practice. She is currently collaborating with secondary mathematics teachers in supporting mathematical arguments as well as investigating how elementary teachers navigate infusing argumentation into integrative STEM instruction.

Karl W. Kosko is an associate professor of Mathematics Education at Kent State University. His work focuses on how mathematical meaning is conveyed, and has addressed classroom argumentation and discourse, multiplicative reasoning, and use of representations of practice in teacher education.

Megan Staples is an associate professor of Mathematics Education in the Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut. Her teaching focuses on the preparation of secondary math teachers. Her research focuses on how teachers organize classroom environments that support powerful practices such as collaboration, justification and argumentation. She has served as PI and Co-PI on multiple grants focused on justification and argumentation including the NSF-funded JAGUAR project, and a state-level Math-Science Partnership grant, Bridging Math Practices.

Blurb

This book aims to advance ongoing debates in the field of mathematics and mathematics education regarding conceptions of argumentation, justification, and proof and the consequences for research and practice when applying particular conceptions of each construct. Through analyses of classroom practice across grade levels using different lenses - particular conceptions of argumentation, justification, and proof - researchers consider the implications of how each conception shapes empirical outcomes. In each section, organized by grade band, authors adopt particular conceptions of argumentation, justification, and proof, and they analyse one data set from each perspective. In addition, each section includes a synthesis chapter from an expert in the field to bring to the fore potential implications, as well as new questions, raised by the analyses. Finally, a culminating section considers the use of each conception across grade bands and data sets.