ISBN-13: 9783642137136 / Angielski / Twarda / 2010 / 199 str.
ISBN-13: 9783642137136 / Angielski / Twarda / 2010 / 199 str.
Thepresentbookisbasedonthelecturesdeliveredbytheauthorinthepastfew yearsaspartoftheCriminalLawcourseoftheFacultyofLawattheOnoAcademic College. There has been little research on the principle of legality in modern criminallaw, althoughthisisoneofthemostancientlegalprinciplesofhuman society. In recent generations there have been several attempts to de?ne the principleconclusively, butonlywithregardtosomeofitsaspects. Nocompreh- sivede?nitionoftheprincipleoflegalityhasbeenattemptedtodate. Aconclusivede?nitionoftheprincipleoflegalityincriminallawrequiresboth anaccurateinward-lookingde?nitionoftheprincipleitself, andanoutward-lo- ingtreatmentofitsrelationwithcriminallawtheory. Onlyacoherenttheorythat includestheprincipleoflegalityasanintegralpartofcriminallawtheorycando justicetotheprincipleoflegality. Thisviewisconsistentwiththescienti?cconcept oflaw, whichregardsthelawaspartofscience. AModernTreatiseonthePrincipleofLegalityinCriminalLawisthereforea scienti?ctreatiseononeofthefourprinciplesofthecriminallaw. Thepresent treatiseisdividedintosixparts, accordingtothescienti?cunderstandingofthe principleoflegalityincriminallaw. Chapter1explorestherelationbetweenthe principleoflegalityandthegeneraltheoryofcriminallawinthecontextofthe structureandthedevelopmentoftheprincipleoflegalityinhumansociety. This chapter outlines the four secondary principles of the principle of legality, and describesthemingeneralterms. Chapters 2 5 discuss in detail each of the four secondary principles of the principleoflegality. Chapter 2discussesthelegitimatesourcesofthecriminal norm, Chap. 3discussestheapplicabilityofthecriminalnormintime, Chap. 4 discussestheapplicabilityofthecriminalnorminplaceandChap. 5discussesthe interpretationofthecriminalnorm. Eachofthefourchaptersconcludeswitha discussionofthecon?ictoflawsissuesrelevanttothesecondaryprincipleunder investigation. Finally, Chap. 6addressestheproblemofthecon?ictoflawswithin thecon?ictsoflawsandroundsoutthediscussion. ix x Preface IwishtothankOnoAcademicCollegeforsupportingthisproject, andespecially DeanofthefacultyoflawandvicechairmanDudiSchwartzforhisstaunchsupport onsomanyimportantoccasions. IthankGabrielLanyiforhiscommentsandAnke SeyfriedofSpringerHeidelbergforguidingthepublicationofthebookfromits inceptiontoitsconclusion. Finally, Iwishtothankmywifeanddaughtersforthe helpfuldiscussionsandsupporttheyofferedalongtheway. KiryatOno, June2010 GabrielHallevy Contents 1 TheMeaningandStructureofthePrincipleofLegality inCriminalLaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. 1 TheRoleofthePrincipleofLegalityintheCriminal LawTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. 1. 1 TheBasicStructureofCriminalLawTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. 1. 2 TheBasicStructureofthePrincipleofLegality inCriminalLaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. 2 DevelopmentofthePrincipleofLegalityinCriminalLaw andItsModernJusti?cations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 TheLegitimateSourcesoftheCriminalNorm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2. 1 TheStructureoftheCriminalNormandItsIdenti?cation . . . . . . . . . . 16 2. 1. 1 ValidConditionalClauses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2. 1. 2 CriminalSanction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2. 1. 3 Classi?cationofOffencesBasedonContent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2. 2 TheLegalSourcesoftheCriminalNorm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2. 2. 1 GeneralPrinciples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2. 2. 2 LegalSources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2. 3 Con?ictofLawsBasedonLegitimateSources oftheCriminalNorm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3 ApplicabilityoftheCriminalNorminTime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3. 1 BasicDistinctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3. 1. 1 DistinctionBetweenProceduralandSubstantive CriminalNorms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3. 1. 2 DistinctionBetweenRelevantPointsinTime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3. 1. 3 DistinctionBetweenContinuous, Temporary, andFragmentedCriminalNorms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3. 1. 4 DistinctionBetweenMitigatingandAggravating CriminalNorms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 xi xii Contents 3. 2 ApplicabilityoftheProceduralCriminalNorminTime . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3. 2. 1 TheGeneralRule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3. 2. 2 ApplicationoftheRule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3. 3 ApplicabilityinTimeoftheSubstantiveCriminalNorm . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3. 3. 1 TheGeneralRule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3. 3. 2 ApplicationoftheRule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3. 4 Con?ictofLawsBasedonApplicabilityoftheCriminal NorminTime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 4 TheApplicabilityoftheCriminalNorminPlace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4. 1 TheBasicDistinctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4. 1. 1 Di