It is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press reporting. The illusion is exploded in this controversial study by the Glasgow University Media Group, originally published in 1976.
It is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press report...
It is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press reporting. The illusion is exploded in a controversial study by the Glasgow University Media Group, originally published in 1976. This is the continuation of that research.
It is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press report...
It is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press reporting. This title explores this illusion.
It is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press report...
First published in 1980, More Bad News is the Second Volume in the research findings of the Glasgow University Media Group. It develops the analytic findings and methods of the first volume Bad News through a series of Case Studies of Television News Coverage, and argues that much of what passes as balanced and factual news reporting is produced from a highly partial viewpoint.
Focusing on the British economy in crisis, and its thematic linkage with the Social Contract during the first four months of 1975, the book deals with three main levels of activity:...
First published in 1980, More Bad News is the Second Volume in the research findings of the Glasgow University Media Group. It develops th...
