Harish, R. S. Ramya, Dhanasekaran, D. Pavai, Ragukanth, K. N. Jayapriya
Ontology developers adopting OWL should consider which sub language best suits their needs. The choice between OWL Lite and OWL DL depends on the extent to which users require the more-expressive constructs provided by OWL DL. The choice between OWL DL and OWL Full mainly depends on the extent to which users require the meta-modeling facilities of RDF Schema Full implementations do not currently exist. OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL DL can be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. Every OWL (Lite, DL, Full) document is an RDF document, and...
Ontology developers adopting OWL should consider which sub language best suits their needs. The choice between OWL Lite and OWL DL depends on the exte...