PART I: WHAT IS PROCESS ALGEBRA? PART II: MATHEMATICS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESSES PART III: THE STRUCTURE-BEHAVIOR COALESCENCE APPROACH PART IV: LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS ALGEBRA PART V: TRANSITIONAL SEMANTICS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS ALGEBRA PART VI: FIRST EXAMPLE -- INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS OF THE ROBOT SYSTEM PART VII: SECOND EXAMPLE -- INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS OF THE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEM
PART I: WHAT IS PROCESS ALGEBRA? PART II: MATHEMATICS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESSES PART III: THE STRUCTURE-BEHAVIOR COALESCENCE APPROACH PART IV: L...
PART I: WHAT IS PROCESS ALGEBRA? PART II: MATHEMATICS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESSES PART III: THE STRUCTURE-BEHAVIOR COALESCENCE APPROACH PART IV: LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS ALGEBRA PART V: TRANSITIONAL SEMANTICS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS ALGEBRA PART VI: OBSERVATION CONGRUENCE THEORY OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESS ALGEBRA PART VII: MULTI-LEVEL VIEW OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PART VIII: CASE STUDY -- KURDI UNIVERSITY
PART I: WHAT IS PROCESS ALGEBRA? PART II: MATHEMATICS OF INFINITE-QUEUE SBC PROCESSES PART III: THE STRUCTURE-BEHAVIOR COALESCENCE APPROACH PART IV: L...
An enterprise comprises multiple views such as strategy/version n, strategy/version n]1, concept, analysis, design, implementation, structure, behavior, and input/output data views. A systems model is required to describe and represent all these multiple views. The systems model describes and represents the enterprise multiple views possibly using two different approaches. The first one is the non-architectural approach and the second one is the architectural approach. The non-architectural approach respectively picks a model for each view. The architectural approach, instead of picking many...
An enterprise comprises multiple views such as strategy/version n, strategy/version n]1, concept, analysis, design, implementation, structure, behavio...
No matter which type of planning, when we start to develop it, the most important issue is to seize the most relevant task to this planning. The task of a plan can be simple or complex. Whether simple or complex, planning task must include the following three major elements: (B) Product/Service, (C) Project Management, and (D) Strategic Management. Because product/service plays an innermost ring role in the planning, so it is surely the most important one. In other words, if the innermost "Product/Service" is not clearly described then neither the second inner "Project Management" nor the...
No matter which type of planning, when we start to develop it, the most important issue is to seize the most relevant task to this planning. The task ...
An enterprise is complex that it comprises multiple views such as strategy/version n, strategy/version n+1, concept, analysis, design, implementation, structure, behavior and input/output data views. Accordingly, an enterprise is defined as a set of interacting components forming an integrated whole of that enterprise's multiple views. Since structure and behavior views are the two most prominent ones among multiple views, integrating the structure and behavior views is a method for integrating multiple views of an enterprise. In other words, structure-behavior coalescence (SBC) results in...
An enterprise is complex that it comprises multiple views such as strategy/version n, strategy/version n+1, concept, analysis, design, implementation,...
An enterprise is complex that it comprises multiple views such as strategy/version n, strategy/version n]1, concept, analysis, design, implementation, structure, behavior and input/output data views. Accordingly, an enterprise is defined as a set of interacting components forming an integrated whole of that enterprise's multiple views. Since structure and behavior views are the two most prominent ones among multiple views, integrating the structure and behavior views is a method for integrating multiple views of an enterprise. In other words, structure-behavior coalescence (SBC) results in...
An enterprise is complex that it comprises multiple views such as strategy/version n, strategy/version n]1, concept, analysis, design, implementation,...
PART I: FORMAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PART II: EXECUTION OF THE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PART III: SINGLE-QUEUE MODEL FOR SCHEDULING OF INTERACTIONS PART IV: MULTI-QUEUE MODEL FOR SCHEDULING OF INTERACTIONS PART V: INFINITE-QUEUE MODEL FOR SCHEDULING OF INTERACTIONS PART VI: VISIBILITY OF VARIABLES
PART I: FORMAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PART II: EXECUTION OF THE SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE PART III: SINGLE-QUEUE MODEL FOR SCHEDULING OF I...
PART I: SYSTEMS THINKING 1.0 PART II: SHORTCOMINGS OF SYSTEMS THINKING 1.0 PART III: THE STRUCTURE-BEHAVIOR COALESCENCE APPROACH PART IV: SYSTEMS THINKING 2.0 PART V: SYSTEM THINKING 2.0 ADVOCATES MATERIALISM-IDEALISM UNITY PART VI: SYSTEM THINKING 2.0 ADVOCATES SUBSTANCE-FUNCTION UNITY PART VII: SYSTEM THINKING 2.0 ADVOCATES STRUCTURALISM-FUNCTIONLISM UNITY
PART I: SYSTEMS THINKING 1.0 PART II: SHORTCOMINGS OF SYSTEMS THINKING 1.0 PART III: THE STRUCTURE-BEHAVIOR COALESCENCE APPROACH PART IV: SYSTEMS THIN...