Thorsteinssons study of Romans poses a thoroughly argued challenge to Pauline scholarship. His argument has the potential of invalidating the reading of Romans 2 hat has contributed to a perception of Paul as utterly negative towards his fellow Jews and first-century Judaism.
Among matters of scholarly dispute is the function and identity of Pauls interlocutor(s) in chapter 2 of Romans. Scholars agree universally that the individual addressed in 2:17-29 is a Jew, but with respect to the identity of the interlocutor of 2:1-5, there is no consensus. The majority of scholars hold that the...
Thorsteinssons study of Romans poses a thoroughly argued challenge to Pauline scholarship. His argument has the potential of invalidating the reading ...