Despite its authoritarian political structure, Egypt s government has held competitive, multi-party parliamentary elections for more than 30 years. This book argues that, rather than undermining the durability of the Mubarak regime, competitive parliamentary elections ease important forms of distributional conflict, particularly conflict over access to spoils. In a comprehensive examination of the distributive consequences of authoritarian elections in Egypt, Lisa Blaydes examines the triadic relationship between Egypt s ruling regime, the rent-seeking elite that supports the regime, and the...
Despite its authoritarian political structure, Egypt s government has held competitive, multi-party parliamentary elections for more than 30 years. Th...
Despite its authoritarian political structure, Egypt s government has held competitive, multi-party parliamentary elections for more than 30 years. This book argues that, rather than undermining the durability of the Mubarak regime, competitive parliamentary elections ease important forms of distributional conflict, particularly conflict over access to spoils. In a comprehensive examination of the distributive consequences of authoritarian elections in Egypt, Lisa Blaydes examines the triadic relationship between Egypt s ruling regime, the rent-seeking elite that supports the regime, and the...
Despite its authoritarian political structure, Egypt s government has held competitive, multi-party parliamentary elections for more than 30 years. Th...