Presents a review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are sustained, in part, upon sound rationale and justification and, in part, upon unfounded lore. This book includes some examples of these 'methodological urban legends' that are characterized by manuscript critiques.
Presents a review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are sustained, in part, upon sound rationale and justification ...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientific rationale and partially in unfounded lore. Some examples of these "methodological urban legends" are characterized by manuscript critiques such as: (a) "your self-report measures suffer from common method bias"; (b) "your item-to-subject ratios are too low"; (c) "you can't generalize these findings to the real world"; or (d) "your effect sizes are too low."
What do these critiques mean, and what is their historical basis? More...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientifi...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientific rationale and partially in unfounded lore. Some examples of these "methodological urban legends" are characterized by manuscript critiques such as: (a) "your self-report measures suffer from common method bias"; (b) "your item-to-subject ratios are too low"; (c) "you can't generalize these findings to the real world"; or (d) "your effect sizes are too low."
What do these critiques mean, and what is their historical basis? More...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientifi...
