Over the course of the past few years, teaching, research, and practice has underscored the importance of performance measurement and criterion development as topics of great interest, considerable debate, and some misunderstanding. It has also become clear that the field needs to address a compendium of research, applications, and issues.
Performance Measurement: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges brings together internationally recognized leaders in the field and each examines the subject matter in a way that has never been done--focusing on the dynamic nature of...
Over the course of the past few years, teaching, research, and practice has underscored the importance of performance measurement and criterion dev...
Bringing together internationally-recognized leaders in the field, this text focuses on the nature of work and the demands being placed on assessment and measurement as core organizational activities.
Bringing together internationally-recognized leaders in the field, this text focuses on the nature of work and the demands being placed on assessment ...
Presents a review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are sustained, in part, upon sound rationale and justification and, in part, upon unfounded lore. This book includes some examples of these 'methodological urban legends' that are characterized by manuscript critiques.
Presents a review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are sustained, in part, upon sound rationale and justification ...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientific rationale and partially in unfounded lore. Some examples of these "methodological urban legends" are characterized by manuscript critiques such as: (a) "your self-report measures suffer from common method bias"; (b) "your item-to-subject ratios are too low"; (c) "you can't generalize these findings to the real world"; or (d) "your effect sizes are too low."
What do these critiques mean, and what is their historical basis? More...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientifi...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientific rationale and partially in unfounded lore. Some examples of these "methodological urban legends" are characterized by manuscript critiques such as: (a) "your self-report measures suffer from common method bias"; (b) "your item-to-subject ratios are too low"; (c) "you can't generalize these findings to the real world"; or (d) "your effect sizes are too low."
What do these critiques mean, and what is their historical basis? More...
This book provides an up-to-date review of commonly undertaken methodological and statistical practices that are based partially in sound scientifi...
