Robert A. Monserud Richard W. Haynes Adelaide C. Johnson
Public debate has stimulated interest in finding greater compatibility among forest management regimes. The debate has often portrayed management choices as tradeoffs between biophysical and socioeconomic components of ecosystems. Here we focus on specific management strategies and emphasize broad goals such as biodiversity, wood production and habitat conservation while maintaining other values from forestlands desired by the public. We examine the following proposition: Commodity production (timber, nontimber forest products)and the other forest values (biodiversity, fish and...
Public debate has stimulated interest in finding greater compatibility among forest management regimes. The debate has often portrayed management choi...
Robert A. Monserud Richard W. Haynes Adelaide C. Johnson
Public debate has stimulated interest in finding greater compatibility among forest management regimes. The debate has often portrayed management choices as tradeoffs between biophysical and socioeconomic components of ecosystems. Here we focus on specific management strategies and emphasize broad goals such as biodiversity, wood production and habitat conservation while maintaining other values from forestlands desired by the public. We examine the following proposition: Commodity production (timber, nontimber forest products)and the other forest values (biodiversity, fish and...
Public debate has stimulated interest in finding greater compatibility among forest management regimes. The debate has often portrayed management choi...