Thomas H. Hammond Chris W. Bonneau Reginald S. Sheehan
Despite several decades of research on Supreme Court decision-making by specialists in judicial politics, there is no good answer to a key question: if each justice's behavior on the Court were motivated solely by some kind of "liberal" or "conservative" ideology, what patterns should be expected in the Court's decision-making practices and in the Court's final decisions? It is only when these patterns are identified in advance that political scientists will be able to empirically evaluate theories which assert that the justices' behavior is motivated by the pursuit of their personal policy...
Despite several decades of research on Supreme Court decision-making by specialists in judicial politics, there is no good answer to a key question: i...
Thomas H. Hammond Chris W. Bonneau Reginald S. Sheehan
Despite several decades of research on Supreme Court decision-making by specialists in judicial politics, there is no good answer to a key question: if each justice's behavior on the Court were motivated solely by some kind of "liberal" or "conservative" ideology, what patterns should be expected in the Court's decision-making practices and in the Court's final decisions? It is only when these patterns are identified in advance that political scientists will be able to empirically evaluate theories which assert that the justices' behavior is motivated by the pursuit of their personal policy...
Despite several decades of research on Supreme Court decision-making by specialists in judicial politics, there is no good answer to a key question: i...