The idea of equality is central to American civic life and one of the foundations of our national identity. Charges of unequal treatment continue to be voiced nationwide, in both the public discourse and the courts, yet there is no consensus on the meaning of equality. Competing views on this topic have erupted into a cultural conflict that looms large in contemporary American politics. In this collection of insightful essays, distinguished scholars in law, history, and social science present varying perspectives on this fundamental concept. Addressing the specific cases behind the...
The idea of equality is central to American civic life and one of the foundations of our national identity. Charges of unequal treatment continue to b...
Using Charlotte, North Carolina, as a case study of the dynamics of racial change in the 'moderate' South, Davison Douglas analyzes the desegregation of the city's public schools from the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision through the early 1970s, when the city embarked upon the most ambitious school busing plan in the nation. In charting the path of racial change, Douglas considers the relative efficacy of the black community's use of public demonstrations and litigation to force desegregation. He also evaluates the role of the city's white business community,...
Using Charlotte, North Carolina, as a case study of the dynamics of racial change in the 'moderate' South, Davison Douglas analyzes the desegregation ...
The United States Supreme Court s 2002 03 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and unduly activist the Court that helped decide the 2000 presidential election and struck down thirty-one federal statutes since 1995 issued a set of surprising, watershed rulings. In a term filled with important and unpredictable decisions, it upheld affirmative action, invalidated a same-sex sodomy statute, and reversed a death sentence due to ineffective assistance of counsel. With essays focused on individual Justices, Court practices, and some of...
The United States Supreme Court s 2002 03 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and undu...
Neal E. Devins Davison M. Douglas Davison M. Douglas
The United States Supreme Court s 2002 03 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and unduly activist the Court that helped decide the 2000 presidential election and struck down thirty-one federal statutes since 1995 issued a set of surprising, watershed rulings. In a term filled with important and unpredictable decisions, it upheld affirmative action, invalidated a same-sex sodomy statute, and reversed a death sentence due to ineffective assistance of counsel. With essays focused on individual Justices, Court practices, and some of...
The United States Supreme Court s 2002 03 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and undu...