In a ground-breaking series of articles, one of them written by a Nobel Laureate, this volume demonstrates the evolutionary dynamic and the transformation of today's democratic societies into scientific-democratic societies. It highlights the progress of modeling individual and societal evaluation by neo-Bayesian utility theory. It shows how social learning and collective opinion formation work, and how democracies cope with randomness caused by randomizers. Nonlinear evolution equations' and serial stochastic matrices of evolutionary game theory allow us to optimally compute possible serial...
In a ground-breaking series of articles, one of them written by a Nobel Laureate, this volume demonstrates the evolutionary dynamic and the transforma...
In a ground-breaking series of articles, one of them written by a Nobel Laureate, this volume demonstrates the evolutionary dynamic and the transformation of today's democratic societies into scientific-democratic societies. It highlights the progress of modeling individual and societal evaluation by neo-Bayesian utility theory. It shows how social learning and collective opinion formation work, and how democracies cope with randomness caused by randomizers. Nonlinear evolution equations' and serial stochastic matrices of evolutionary game theory allow us to optimally compute possible serial...
In a ground-breaking series of articles, one of them written by a Nobel Laureate, this volume demonstrates the evolutionary dynamic and the transforma...
Erwin Schroedinger has been described as one of the greatest figures of theoretical physics, but there is another side to the man: not only did his work revolutionize physics, it also radically changed the foundations of our modern world-view, modern biology, philosophy of science, philosophy of the mind, and epistemology.
Erwin Schroedinger has been described as one of the greatest figures of theoretical physics, but there is another side to the man: not only did his wo...
Grundlagenfragen wissenschaftlicher Theorien zahlen zu den "nicht leicht" beantwortbaren Problemen, bietet doch bereits ihre Formulierung ein Feld des Disputes, und gelangen erst recht die Losungsvorschlage nur selten in den Rang generell akzeptierter Annahmen. Naturlich gibt es verschiedene Grunde und Grunde verschiedenen Gewichtes, warum Philosophen und Physiker gemeinsam versuchen, bestimmte Fragen zu behandeln. Und es ist nur zu bekannt, dass einige solcher Fragen eher von Physikern und einige eher von Philosophen gestellt werden, ohne dass man sich auf diesem Gebiet uber klare Grenzen...
Grundlagenfragen wissenschaftlicher Theorien zahlen zu den "nicht leicht" beantwortbaren Problemen, bietet doch bereits ihre Formulierung ein Feld des...
