Unequivocal Justice challenges the prevailing view within political philosophy that broadly free market regimes are inconsistent with the basic principles of liberal egalitarian justice. Freiman argues that the liberal egalitarian rejection of free market regimes rests on a crucial methodological mistake. Liberal egalitarians regularly assume an ideal -public interest- model of political behavior and a nonideal -private interest- model of behavior in the market and civil society. Freiman argues that this asymmetrical application of behavioral assumptions biases the analysis and...
Unequivocal Justice challenges the prevailing view within political philosophy that broadly free market regimes are inconsistent with the ...