Niehoff and Sullivan's review of First Amendment law has many strengths: clarity and readability, an embrace of free speech values that does not slight opposing interests, and an important insight into the role of due process concerns in shaping judicial doctrine. Students, general readers, and scholars will all find the book valuable. Dan Farber, Sho Sato Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley
Introduction; Part I. Core Values: 1. Instrumental value arguments for free speech; 2. Intrinsic value arguments for free speech; 3. Free expression and due process values; 4. The everyday first amendment; Part II. History: 5. The First amendment prior to 1919; 6. The first amendment from 1919-1963; 7. The first amendment from 1964–present: Free speech broadened and compartmentalized; 8. The first amendment from 1964–present: Hard cases; Part III. Basic Principles: 9. Content and viewpoint restrictions are disfavored; 10. Vagueness and overbreadth are special concerns; 11. Exceptions must be limited and narrowly crafted; Part IV. Current Controversies: 12. Hate speech; 13. Campaign finance regulation; 14. Speech in public schools; 15. Academic freedom; 16. Speech on the internet.