Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten

ISBN-13: 9781009198936 / Angielski

Kathleen Kim; Kevin Lapp; Jennifer Lee

Opis

Offers a novel contribution to immigration legal scholarship by rewriting Supreme Court immigration law opinions from a critical immigration legal theory lens. Contests fundamental presumptions in doctrinal immigration law and shows how entrenched system of power, alongside racism, sexism, and stereotypes, have marred the immigration law landscape.

Widoczna okładka, to zdjęcie poglądowe, a rzeczywista szata graficzna może różnić się od prezentowanej. Nie gwarantujemy zgodności okładki z prezentowanym zdjęciem.

Recenzje

'Informed by the insights of feminist legal theory and critical race theory, these authors reimagine landmark Supreme Court immigration cases. The rewritten opinions illustrate how a more generous legal imagination could have avoided past injustices, and show us how law can better serve the ends of justice going forward.' Jennifer Chacon, University of California, Berkeley School of Law

Spis treści

1. Introduction Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp and Jennifer J. Lee; 2. Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 US 275 (1875) Julie Dahlstrom and Stewart Chang; 3. Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 US 651 (1892) Eunice C. Lee and Stella Burch Elias; 4. United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649 (1898) Rachel Rosenbloom and Jonathan Weinberg; 5. United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 US 204 (1923) Jaya Ramji-Nogales and Joy Kanwar; 6. Landon v. Plasencia, 459 US 21 (1982) Sabrina Balgamwalla and Erin Corcoran; 7. Plyler v. Doe, 457 US 202 (1982) Michael Olivas and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia; 8. Jean v. Nelson, 472 US 846 (1985) Raymond Audain and Patricia Winograd; 9. Reno v. Flores, 507 US 292 (1993) Lindsay Harris and Julia Hernández; 10. Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 US 678 (2001) Nicole Hallett, Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton; 11. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 US 137 (2002) Ruben Garcia and Kati Griffith; 12. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 US 356 (2010) Jack Chin and Marissa Montes; 13. Arizona v. United States, 567 US 387 (2012) Kristina Campbell and Annie Lai; 14. Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) Ahilan Arulanantham, Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel; 15. Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) Kevin Johnson and Jennifer Lee Koh.