Time Travel and Our Parallel Worlds: All New In-Depth Real Life Stories In the News

ISBN-13: 9781537436265 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 60 str.

Richard Bullivant

Opis

It has been more than sixty years since physicist Hugh Everett III first proposed his Many Worlds Interpretation and scientists have been arguing about it ever since. This is because the implications of 'Many Worlds' is just so mind boggling. Not only is our universe or dimension of reality not the only dimension of reality, but it's just one of an infinite number of other parallel worlds and, yes, all of those 'other' worlds are tucked in right next to ours. Perhaps only the thinnest of veils separates us from all the rest. Many scientists still say the Many Worlds theory carries too much metaphysical baggage. On the other hand, a survey conducted of a cross section of the physicists around the world just ten years ago showed that 68% of them now agree that the Many Worlds Interpretation is either 'true' or 'mostly true'. So now it seems that even the most mainstream of scientists agree that we live in a universe teeming with parallel worlds. Perhaps fewer are on board with time travel but, as we have seen, the two always seem to go together, or at least have something to do with one another. In the final analysis, it's not science that is going to convince the world that parallel universes are real and that time travel is possible. Sooner or later, the truth is going to be undeniable. When enough people have real-life encounters with a time-slip or a slip into another dimension, sooner or later a critical mass will develop until a consensus is reached. That consensus may very well be: Of course we live in a Multiverse; yes we can have contact and interaction with all of those other parallel worlds, and that also means we can travel in time. We know it is true and possible because it happens every day. Contents Include: RAF Bentwaters Circles The Skinwalker Ranch Doorways Fata Morgana"

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.