Chapter IV: The social strain: reversed causalities and the risk of weakening the lesson on sustainability
IV.1. When social peace undermines the logic of sustainability
IV.2. The anti-social heresy of anti-economism
IV.3. Reassigning the development paradigm in the area of distributive justice
IV.3.1. Distribution before production: The workplace promise
IV.3.2. Pikettism or the pathos of quantitative levelling
IV.4. Market social economy of sustainability
Conclusions: Redistributive justice: a Trojan horse of unsustainability
Chapter V: Founder benchmarks in environmental economics
V.1. Whose land is the “mother of wealth”? What means the physiocracy today?
V.2. Why is the classical Marxist preoccupied with pollution and resource exhaustion?
V.3. The reasonable pessimism of Ricardo and Malthus
V.4. Marshall and Pigou: The pollutant has to pay.
Conclusions: The environment as an implicit preoccupation of economic growth
Chapter VI: Decrease – a logical inadequacy
VI.1. Between hypocrisy and law-like necessity
VI.2. Is Mill a predecessor of decrease?
VI.3. The seductive logic of decrease: Nicolae Georgescu-Roegen
VI.4. Happiness through decreasing
VI.5. Towards a new consumption dialectic
Chapter VII: Validation of the classics: Long term sustainability
VII.1. Schumpeter, Kuznets, Davos. A new face of ”creative destruction”
VII.2. Evidence of classical lesson confirmation
VII.2.1. Development via workshop instead of commercial company
VII.2.2. Demand or offer – a false problem
VII.2.3. Ricardo, Marx vs Menger vs. Keynes or “what does the state do with our money?”
VII.2.4. Deflation, entrepreneurship and sustainability
Conclusion: In a long term we are not all dead
Chapter VIII: New opportunities for sustainability in a globalised world
VIII.1. What does emergent sustainability rely on?
VIII.2. Commitment to future generations in the context of mass migration
VIII.3. Nationalism and sustainability
VIII.4. Moral debt and the colours of globalisation
Conclusion: What it means to be sustainable in the 21st century
Ion Pohoaţă is Professor at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.
Delia-Elena Diaconaşu is Research fellow at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.
Vladimir-Mihai Crupenschi is Associate Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.
This book argues that the theory of sustainable development lost some of its rigor because of two main reasons. The first manifests itself as an inflation of concepts that hampers the correct understanding of sustainability’s essence. The second one consists of a departure from the traditional scientific sources of the classicists and, in part, neoclassicists. Exploiting relevant areas of their works, the authors outline the theoretical framework necessary to promote a healthy version of sustainability. Of utmost interest prove to be areas such as: the formation process of natural prices and natural rate of interest; placing growth before employment and placing production before distribution, consumption, and social justice.
The main idea of the book consists of a call for breaking away from the impure forms of the theory of sustainable development and its reconstruction through the reconciliation with the laws of healthy growth as they are highlighted in the works of the founders. The authors make the case for an approach to sustainable development that is holistic, macroeconomic, and institutionalist, where social, ecological, and economic components are reconciled. This work presents a fresh perspective in the context of current works on sustainability, serving as an accessible research resource and public policy decision guide.