The Negro's Struggle for Education in Early 20th Century America

ISBN-13: 9783656500025 / Angielski / Miękka / 2013 / 34 str.

Nico Hubner

Opis

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject American Studies - Culture and Applied Geography, grade: 1,7, Martin Luther University (Institut fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: The U.S. in the 1920s: Culture, Society, and Politics, language: English, abstract: Early 20th century America was a place where the African American had little or no say in society. Only 35 years after liberation the Negro was still struggling against race prejudices that amongst other things kept him from enjoying the same education as whites did. This discrimination had its roots in an obsolete worldview Americans had taken over from the late 19th century and according to which the Negro evolution had never passed the stage of savagery. To counteract this inflammatory discrimination Negro leaders like W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington rose and gave proposals about the right program for Negro education. Although they differed considerably in their views, they aimed for the same goal; the advancement of the Negro race. Apparently, white leaders such as Thomas Jesse Jones, justifying their stance with scientific proof, constantly opposed them. In juxtaposing the different views this work is trying to shed light on the Negro's struggle for education in early 20th century America. For this purpose a revision of contemporary literature, surveys, statistics and legal documents was of chief importance. The first part thus gives a preliminary account of the progressive debate that took place in the first years of the 20th century. Since whites based their discriminative attitude on evolutionary theory, a short summary of Lewis Henry Morgan's Ancient Society is given, and it is shown to which extend it influenced contemporary thinking. The next part compares Thomas Jesse Jones' recommendations on Negro education, derived from an extensive study he conducted, with W.E.B. Du Bois' and Booker T. Washington's views on that matter. The second part of this work starts out to give