Introduction: Literary Activism, Clarity and Confusion
I. Sartre and the Aesthetic of Clarity
II. Adorno and the Aesthetic of Confusion
III. The Use(lessness) of Literature and Language
Part I: Naturalists and Nietzscheans: Codifying Clarity and Confusion
Chapter 1: “For Love of Clarity”: Émile Zola, Practice, and the Political Potential of Realistic Literature
I. “Tout voir, tout savoir”: Seeing as Knowing
II. Content to Know III. The Practical Uses of Clarity
Chapter 2: Grounds for Confusion: Nietzsche, Theory, and the Political Potential of Anti-Realism
I. “Das Problem der Wissenschaft”: Against Knowing
II. “Clarity Bordering on Stupidity”: The Form of Confusion
III. The Practical Uses of Confusion
Part II: Ambiguities of Activism: Complicating Clarity and Confusion
Chapter 3: Between Theory and Practice: Matthew Arnold, Thomas Mann, Julien Benda, and the Purpose of the Intellectual
I. “Apostle[s] of Political Detachment”?
II. Criticism between Clarity and Confusion
III. Criticism as Activism
IV. Between Theory and Practice, Still
Chapter 4: “Different Kinds of Clarity”: Science, Sense, and Utilitarian Realism in Bertolt Brecht
I. Naturalist Brecht?
II. The Sense of Brecht
III. “The Truth is Concrete”: Brecht’s Materialism
IV. “That Brechtian Usefulness”
Chapter 5: Pressing Engagement: Jean-Paul Sartre and the Aesthetic Problem of the Political
I. Communication, Clarity, and Confusion
II. Forms of Engagement: Confusing Sartre
III. To Change the Subject: Narcissistic Activism
Chapter 6: An Other Engagement: Simone de Beauvoir and the Ethical Problem of the Political I. The Problem of Engagement
II. The Aesthetics and Ethics of Engagement in The Mandarins
Conclusion: Contemporary Engagements with Clarity and Confusion
I. Peter Handke: From the Ivory Tower
II. Toni Morrison: “How to See without Pictures”
III. J.M Coetzee: “Surprising Involvement”
Works Cited
Geoffrey A. Baker is Associate Professor of Humanities (Literature) at Yale-NUS College, Singapore. He is the author of Realism’s Empire, in addition to articles on political aesthetics, realism, and other topics.
What should literature with political aims look like? This book traces two rival responses to this question, one prizing clarity and the other confusion, which have dominated political aesthetics since the late nineteenth century. Revisiting recurrences of the avant-garde experimentalism versus critical realism debates from the twentieth century, Geoffrey A. Baker highlights the often violent reductions at work in earlier debates. Instead of prizing one approach over the other, as many participants in those debates have done, Baker instead focuses instead on the manner in which the debate itself between these approaches continues to prove productive and enabling for politically engaged writers. This book thus offers a way beyond the simplistic polarity of realism vs. anti-realism in a study that is focused on influential strands of thought in England, France, and Germany and that covers well-known authors such as Zola, Nietzsche, Arnold, Mann, Brecht, Sartre, Adorno, Lukács, Beauvoir, Morrison, and Coetzee.