Second Over All Overview Part 1

ISBN-13: 9781539044291 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 358 str.

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Opis

Notwithstanding the pose Mainstream physics tries to uphold, the entirety of physics still use the idea of magical forces intervening in nature and they still base concepts on unexplained novelties. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct I recognised the impossible double standards Mainstream physics apply to promote their much shady explaining. In short I tested Newton's principles and found the principles to be wanting. A line or spot starting at zero would be shorter than the shortest line possible. For obvious reasons can no line, or any line grow or extend from zero because such a line must then quit zero and become something, thus abandon its original value. When any line is starting from point zero it can never leave zero because of the influence of being zero disqualifies any possibility of growth. If the line then had to grow in all directions at the same pace the line must therefore be a circle or being three-dimensional, a sphere. The inconsistencies Newton introduced brought science double vision and to compensate for these bogus truths supporting their incredible theories, they simplify issues to such a level where what they embark on, is the meaningless acceptance of the unproven and they proclaim to understand what are meaningless inconsistencies and to achieve this they create scenarios which use the entanglement of deception. It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. The worst part is that the group of people normally considered as the wisest bunch there is, never did prudent testing on Newtonian presumptions, while to test the presumptions is most easy to do. If you think those in charge of astrophysics are the pillars of trust, then get wise by reading the following. This betrayal on their part and misusing the public's good nature to be used in schemes to get the public conned must end and I pray that this book form the first step in resisting the arrogance of the Academic Physicist' will be successful in that regard. The sifting process they named examinations. Then you better read on and I will remove your blindfold and show you what a world of deception the Academic Physicist force on us. If you are a student in the science of physics, then ask your Educated Masters to please explain the following abnormalities you are about to read in this book and insist on a clear explanation about the inconsistencies they promote while tutoring physics as if the physics they present are the most flawless and accurate institution there has ever been. Let them mathematically show how one would go about and use Newton's visionary formula to calculate the force of gravity by replacing the symbols with the actual values in mass that the items refer to have. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. You are about to discover science that was hiding in plane sight ever since man discovered science. What singularity is? Where to locate singularity What truly formed the Universe? What is the Titius Bode law? Resolving the Titius Bode law Still science reject these laws and thereby reject nature in favour of Newton...and nature does not provide any inclination as to where Newton or his ideas could be found working

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.