1. Introduction: Comparative Post-Conflict Power Sharing Models for Syria
The Dilemma of Post “Arab Spring” Transition
Declining States and Rising Communitarianism
The Syrian Conflict and Prospective Resolutions
Peacebuilding in Syria
Power Sharing as Peacebuilding
Comparative Power Sharing Agreements
Conclusion
2. Resolving Identity Conflict in the Middle East: A Theoretical Understanding
Theoretical Definition of Identity Conflict
Resolving Identity Conflict Through Power Sharing
The Syrian Conflict and Consociationalism
Conclusion
3. Bridging Elite and Grassroots Initiatives: The Road to Sustainable Peace in Syria
Introduction
The Syrian Conflict: Dilemmas for Mediators
Elite Level Process: Power Sharing Arrangements and Non-Retributive Justice Measures
Political Power Sharing + Non-Retributive Justice Initiatives
Military Power Sharing + Non-Retributive Justice Initiatives
Economic Power Sharing + Non-Retributive Justice Initiatives
Local Level Process: Peacebuilding and Reconciliation
Conclusion
4. Peace-Building in Syria Through Power-Sharing: A Study of Possibilities
Introduction
The Consociational Model of Power Sharing
Peacebuilding and Power Sharing
Indian Power Sharing (1947-67)
Lebanese Power Sharing (1943-75)
Peace Processes through Power Sharing in Syria
Power Sharing Possibilities in Syria
Overarching Loyalty
External Threat
Tradition of Accommodation
Small Population and Territory Size
Conclusion
5. Women Leading Reconciliation: A Paradigm Shift in Conflict Resolutions
Gender Roles in Peace-building
Gender Violence in the Syrian Conflict
The Existing Debate on Conflict Resolution and Gender
Politics, Protection, and Privilege
The Need for a Paradigm Shift
Gender Role in Conflict Reconciliation among the Syrians
Conclusion
6. Pathways to Reconciliation in Divided Societies: Islamist Groups in Lebanon and Mali
Introduction
Reconciliation and Islamist Pathways
The Insufficiencies of Classical Approaches
Situational Logic and Power Issues
The Case of Lebanon: Salafism and the Constraints of Realpolitik
The Case of Mali: Global Religious Cleavages or Local Grievances?
Conclusion and Some Tentative Lessons for Reconciliation in Syria
7. Could the Partition be the Way to End the Syrian War?
Introduction
Burdens and Obstacles for the Success of Desecuritization Strategies
The Prospect of Failure for Power Sharing as a Guide to the Desecuritization of Ethnic Conflicts
Pros and Cons of a Partition Plan: A New Course of Action Proposed by the International Powers: US and Russia
Final Considerations
8. Ways forward in Syria
Crisis in Post-Arab Spring National Discourse
Conflict Mitigation in Syria
Multi-Communitarian Consociationalism
Power Sharing for Syria: A Reconciliation Pathway
Peacebuilding Prerequisites for Power Sharing Agreements
Conclusion: The Challenges Ahead
Imad Salamey is Associate Professor of Political Science and the Director of the Institute for Social Justice and Conflict Resolution at the Lebanese American University.
Mohammed Abu-Nimer is Senior Advisor to KAICIID and Professor in the School of International Service at American University, USA.
Elie Abouaoun is Director of Middle East and North Africa Programs at the US Institute of Peace.
The book surveys comparative power sharing models implemented in societies that have faced identity-conflicts, with attention given to post-conflict design. It analyzes the success and pitfalls of international experiences before proposing a model for Syria. Contributors address the central question: which among the set of power-sharing agreements that have helped settle protracted identity-driven armed conflict can provide Syria with a platform for dialogue, negotiation, and conflict mitigation? The comparative analysis advanced in this book extracts lessons from countries such as Bosnia-Herzegovina, India, Iraq, Lebanon, Mali, Northern Ireland, the Philippines and Sudan. The prospect of a post-conflict distribution of power in Syria is then unraveled from different sectarian, ethnic and regional perspectives. The authors also address challenges of peacebuilding such as violent extremism, gender participation, resettlements, retributions, transitional justice, integration of armed groups and regional and international sponsorship.