Plasma Versus the Big Bang: Illustrated Science

ISBN-13: 9781523803262 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 126 str.

Rolf a. F. Witzsche

Opis

In the Big-Bang-cosmos mythology everything that exists in the universe exists in atomic form. A giant explosion is deemed to have created all the matter in the universe. Every sun in every galaxy is deemed to be atomic in nature, powered by fusing its hydrogen atoms into helium, whereby it burns itself out. That's the theory. The reality is the opposite of it. In the real universe, according to evidence, almost nothing exists as atomic matter. Every sun in every galaxy is a sphere of plasma, which is powered by electric interaction at its surface, with cosmic plasma that flows through the galaxies. The Plasma Universe is not entropic in nature, but is self-creating and self-sustaining by the nature of space that is energy itself; which is a concept pioneered by David Bohm, whom Einstein had referred to as his successor. In the real universe, nothing is running down towards an eventual energy depletion death. In fact, the universe is anti-entropic and expanding and progressing. We, ourselves are evidence of this progression. Neither is our Sun isolated from the progressive nature of the universe, but expresses its dynamics, its resonating plasma streams, and their reflection in the climate on Earth. Climate Change reflects the nature of the universe. The Earth itself is the creation of the Sun, with its atoms having been massively synthesized in high-energy times near the center of the galaxy. The synthesizing plasma fusion is presently at a low state, though it is currently enhanced for our Sun by electromagnetic 'Primer Fields' that focus interstellar plasma onto the Sun in a highly condensed manner. When the plasma-focusing system becomes inactive, below the required threshold conditions, the Sun reverts to a type of cosmic default level with 70% less energy being radiated, and higher rates of solar cosmic-ray flux being experienced. At the present rate of plasma diminishment being experienced, the solar activity phase-shift threshold to the next Ice Age period may be crossed in 30 years, or in the 2050s, most likely. With the primer-fields system gone inactive by then, the climate on Earth will get 40 times colder than the Little Ice Age in the 1600s had been. Ice core evidence promises that. Without the needed preparations for human living in such an environment, 99% of humanity would die of starvation, both by the cold, and by CO2 depletion that diminishes agriculture, as more CO2 becomes dissolved into the sea. With the 'Primer Fields' being critical for our very existence, the exploration of them is likewise critical. In the Little Ice Age, between 10% and up to 30% of the populations in Europe had perished by starvation. The last Big Ice Age was evidently vastly harsher. Only 1-10 million people emerged from it alive. That's all we had after 2 million years of development. We want to do far better this time around; and we can, with large-scale technological infrastructures for our food supply. But will we create them? Will we get the job done in the 30 years that we still have left before the Ice Age starts anew? Will we even consider it? And how certain are we that the phase shift to the next glaciation period will begin, as the evidence suggests, in the 2050s? We have no slack on this front. Should we fail us on this absolute front, we would be committing suicide. Numerous fields of evidence tell us that the next Ice Age is near. That's where the truth begins. Most of the evidence was discovered in the 1990s and thereafter. Some evidence is measured in ice cores; some is measured in space, by satellites. Some measurements are also made on the ground in terms of measurements of the Earth's magnetic-pole drift observed in northern Canada. All of this is seen combined with high-energy physics experiments at a leading national laboratory, and is also explored in the small in static experiments. That's what the book is based on.

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.