Not the U.S. but the World Rejects Hillary/Obama: Executive Intelligence Review; Volume 43, Issue 46

ISBN-13: 9781541234703 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 34 str.

Lyndon H. Larouche Jr

Opis

Not the U.S., but the World Rejects Hillary/Obama Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., addressed the LaRouche PAC Policy Committee in the following terms on Nov. 9. You can't limit yourself to the United States to understand what has happened. What's happened is that a lot of the world has gotten into this act. Some people who are naive may say it's local, that it's only in the United States or parts of the United States. But that's not true. This development was absolutely international; it was not national, but international in its entire character. Germany was a big factor in it. Vladimir Putin of Russia was a big factor in this situation. So that's the pattern; it's not a local pattern in the United States. U.S. factors have significance, but it's not something you can parcel out under categories; you have to see the larger, total picture. That's evident once we start to treat the economy seriously. In other words, instead of trying to figure out how to get this particular product out in a certain way, and so forth, the point is that you have to start on a global basis. What we're dealing with is on a global basis. Now this has been the actual condition for some time, but it has not been evident because the people have not categorized these things in the proper way. What they've done, is they've accurately looked for things which they think are important, -and they are important. But the issue that governs here, is international, global. And the area is nothing less than global. What you're looking at, is a breakdown of the entire previously existing pattern of life in the world. And when you see that, then you get the whole picture. Germany was a big part of it. Bill Clinton, by himself, was a crucial figure in this whole process. He set it up, in part. And so, you've got to look at this thing, not from the standpoint of what is important in this area or not; you've got to look at the overall picture, otherwise you don't get the right answers. Hillary was dumped globally; everything was essentially a global process. This didn't mean that everybody in the planet is working on this thing on a consistent basis, but Germany, Putin, Russia, Asia, all of these elements and more are in the package. You cannot divide this away from that whole. For example: how did the thing get started. Well, Obama was thrown out. How was he thrown out? Well, it was started by Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton set off the first motion which destroyed the whole business. Therefore, you have to look at the totality of the interaction among elements which are definable as having specific characteristics. You don't try to build up something by collecting predetermined desk-work. Because the first one to do this was Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was the one who sent his wife into the garbage-pail, which is exactly where she belonged. But all these other cases depend upon those kinds of characteristics, and that's the way you have to think of it, not in terms of what the difference is among different states or different areas, and so forth. As in Germany; Germany moved in in a big way, immediately. Key figures in Germany were laying down the law to this effect. Some were not responding, but most of them were. Putin was a key figure. The entirety of Asia was key. So, the whole thing is something that's acting together, not as a a collection, not as group by group; not state-by-state. We have to get a new conception of citizenship in the U.S. What we've been operating on were ideas which were never right, throughout the 21st Century to date. What we've just learned now, implicitly globally: China, Russia and so forth: we are all part of one process, and they are not differentiated from the process as such. You have different shadings, as it were, but not different kinds of organization.

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.