ISBN-13: 9780415470056 / Angielski / Twarda / 2010 / 448 str.
ISBN-13: 9780415470056 / Angielski / Twarda / 2010 / 448 str.
This book discusses court-oriented legal reforms across Asia with a focus on the creation of 'new courts' over the last 20 years. Contributors discuss how to judge new courts and examine whether the many new courts introduced over this period in Asia have succeeded or failed. The 'new courts' under scrutiny are mainly specialist courts, including those established to hear cases involving intellectual property disputes, bankruptcy petitions, commercial contracts, public law adjudication, personal law issues and industrial disputes. The justification of the trend to 'judicialize' disputes has seen the invocation of Western-style rule of law as necessary for the development of the market economy, democratization, good governance and the upholding of human rights. This book also includes critics of court building who allege that it serves a Western agenda rather than serving local interests, and that the emphasis on judicialization marginalises alternative local and traditional modes of dispute resolution. Adopting an explicitly comparative perspective, and contrasting the experiences of important Asian states - China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brunei, Thailand and Indonesia - this book considers critical questions including:
This book discusses legal reforms across Asia involving the creation of new courts over the last 20 years, and examines to what extent they have succeeded or failed. During this period there have been numerous instances of the creation of new courts in Asia. These ‘new courts’ are mainly specialist courts, which have a specific jurisdiction, whether that is over cases involving intellectual property disputes, bankruptcy petitions, commercial contracts, public law adjudication, personal law issues, labour or industrial disputes. This trend has clearly intensified since the economic crisis of 1997/8 and the consequent emphasis on good governance and commercial dispute resolution. The justification of this trend towards ‘judicialization’ has been that implementation of Western-style rule of law is necessary for the development of the market economy, democratization, good governance and the upholding of human rights. Adopting an explicitly comparative perspective, and contrasting the experiences of important Asian states including China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia and Indonesia, this book considers critical questions including:
In addition, it considers critics of court building who allege that it is a Western agenda that does not serve local interests, and that the emphasis on judicialization marginalises alternative local and traditional modes of dispute resolution.
This book will not only be of interest to legal scholars and practitioners, but also to development specialists, economists and political scientists.