Networking Argument

ISBN-13: 9780367347024 / Angielski / Twarda / 2019 / 550 str.

Carol Winkler

Opis

Networking Argument presents selected works from the 20^th Biennial Alta Argumentation Conference sponsored by the National Communication Association and the American Forensics Association in 2017.

Spis treści

Keynote Address  1. Disavowing Networks, Affirming Networks: Neoliberalism and Its Challenge to Democratic Deliberation  Spotlighted Theories and Practices of Networking Argument  2. Substance: An Exploration of the State of Argument in the Post-Fact Era  3. Ideology, Argument, and the Post-Truth Panic  4. A Materialist Perspective on Argument Networks as Contentious Politics  5. More Disingenuous Controversy: Hashtags, Chants, and an Election  6. How Technoliberals Argue  7. Network Matters: Black Lives and Blue Lives Advocacy in On and Offline Settings  8. Networked Public Argument as Terrain for Statecraft  Strategic Use of Definition in Networked Argument  9. Ideological Conservatism vs. Faux Populism in Donald Trump’s Inaugural Address  10. Populists Argue, but Populism Is Not an Argumentation (And Why the Distinction Matters for Argumentation Theory)  11. Contrasting Ideological Networks: Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump  12. The Cyber Imperative: Ligatures as Ordering Devices  13. The Agentic Earth Topos: Figuring a Violent Earth at the End of the Anthropocene  14. What Makes a Woman a Woman? The I.O.C.’s Deliberation over Sex in International Sport  15. The Discursive Construction of the Anti-Nuclear Activist  16. The Visible and the Invisible: Arguing about Threats to Loyalty in the Internet Age  17. When Do Perpetrators Count: A Longitudinal Analysis of News Definitions of Deceased Mass Shooters  18. Defining "Birth Rape": Networked Argument Resources for Mothers’ Advocacy  19. When They Found Her: Networked Argument and Contested Memory  Strategic Use of Association and Dissociation in Networked Argument  20. Reading Freaks: Trump in an Analogical Hermeneutic Network  21. Petitioning a Mormon God: Analogical Argument as a Means of Revelation in the Ordain Women Movement  22. Extinguished Dissent: Norman Morrison’s Self-immolation as Argument by Sacrifice  23. Timescape 9/11: Networked Memories  24. Analogy and Argument in the Rhetoric of Science  25. Specification, Dissociation, and Voting Rights in the United States  26. Hispanic Politicians on the Rise: Argumentation Strategies of Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio  27. Escaping the "Broken Middle": Establishing Argumentative Presence within Association and Disassociation  28. Challenges of Networked Circulation within Advocacy Campaigns  29. Accumulating Affect and Visual Argument: The Case of the 2015 Japanese Hostage Crisis  30. Analyzing Public Diplomacy for Japan-U.S. Reconciliation  Strategic Use of Authority in Networked Arguments  31. Challenging a Culture of Secrecy: Investigating the Emergence of Antenarrative Storytelling in Community Responses to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation  32. The Visual Depiction of Statehood in Daesh’s Dabiq Magazine and al-Naba’ Newsletter  33. Networked Argumentation via Collective Rhetorics at the Women’s March on the Utah State Capitol and the Women’s March on Washington  34. Climate Change Argumentation: Subnational Networks, Interest Convergence, and Multiple Publics  35. Networking, Circulation, and Publicity of Climate Change Discourses and Arguments: An Examination of Leonardo Dicaprio’s Climate Change Advocacy  36. Arguments for Women’s Banks and the Possibilities and Limits of Corporate Structural Mimesis as Private-Public Argument Networks  37. Administrative Arguments and Network Governance: The Case of Women’s Health  38. Networks of Violence: Converging Representations of the Eric Garner Lynching  39. Performing Hegemonic Masculinity: Trump’s Framing of U.S. Foreign Policy  40. Argument and the Foundations of Social Networks: Affective Argument and Popular American History  41. Data Cannot Speak for Themselves: Unreasonable Claims within the Big Social Data Community  42. Scientific Argument Networks and the Polytechtonic Art of Rhetoric  Argument Circulation in Online Networks  43. Arguments of a New Virtual Religion: How Athenism "Clicks" New Members and Reimagines the Mind-Body Dualism  44. "Nasty Women": "Dialectical Controversy," Argumentum Ad Personam, and Aggressive Rebuttals  45. The Rage Network: Form, Affective Arguments, and Toxic Masculinity in Digital Space  46. Polemic Platforms and the "Woman Card": Trumping Truth with Enthymemes in the Twitterverse  47. Following Affective Winds Over Panmediated Networks: Image-Drive Activism in Chengdu, China  48. Je (Ne) Suis…: Exploring the Performative Contradiction in Anti-Clicktivism Arguments  49. Memes as Commonplace: Ted Cruz, Serial Killers, and the Making of Networked Multitudes  50. Critical Deliberation Under Fire: Milblogging, Free Speech, and the "Soldiers’ Protocol to Enable Active Communication Act"  51. Embedded Argumentation in Digital Media Networks: On "Native" Advertising  52. Too Srat to Care: Participatory Culture and the Information Economy of Total Sorority Move  53. Social Physics and the Moral Economy of Spreadable Media: An Integrated Model for Communication Networking  Argument Circulation in Offline Networks  54. Networks of Argument and Relationality in the Contemporary Use of Auschwitz Numbers in the New England Holocaust Memorial  55. Networked Reconciliation  56. To Tell Our Own Truths: Settler Postcolonialism as an Antecedent to Native American Argumentation Studies  57. Rhetorical Rumors: Hauntology in International Feminicidio Discourse  58. Networked Memories: Remembering Barbara Jordan in 21st Century Immigration Debates  59. Remembering Roosevelt: Arguing for Memory Through Public and Private Networks  60. Appearance Trumps Substance: The Enduring Legacy of the Great Debate of September 26, 1960  61. "Morning in America": Ronald Reagan’s Legacy of Population as Argument  62. Networking Legal Arguments: Prudential Accommodation in National Federation v. Sebelius  Evaluating Argumentation Networks  63. Rising to the Defense of Ad Hominem Arguments  64. The Fallacy of Sweeping Generalization  65. Exhortation in Interpersonal Discussion  66. Writing about Serial Arguments: The Effects of Manipulating Argument Perspective  67. Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness Are Two Things Apiece  68. Is Fact-checking Biased? A Computerized Content Analysis  69. Building Arguments and Attending to Face in Small Claims Court: Distinctive Features of the Genre  70. Argumentation as a Practical Discipline  71. Networks, Norms, and the Problem of Capable Arguers  72. The Micropolitics of Control: Fascism, Desire, and Argument in President Trump’s America  Evaluating Debating Networks  73. Networking Debate and Civic Engagement: Measuring the Impact of High School Debate Camps  74. Designing Public Debates to Facilitate Dynamic Updating in a Network Society  75. Community-Based Participatory Debate: A Synthesis of Debate Pedagogy, Practice, and Research  76. Text, Talk, Argue: How to Improve Text-Driven Political Conversations  77. Gender Diversity in Debate in Japan: An Examination of Debate Competitions at the Secondary and Tertiary Levels  78. Conceptualizing Academic Debate in Japan: A Study of Judging Philosophy Statements  79. Big in Japan?: A Note on the Japanese Reception of American Policy Debate  80. Evolutions and Devolutions in Practice: Theory Arguments in Recent English-speaking College Policy Debate in Japan  81. Notes on the Humor of Translation: American Policy Debate Theory and Comic Translations

O autorze

Carol Winkler is Professor of Communication Studies at Georgia State University, USA, where she leads the interdisciplinary Transcultural Conflict and Violence Initiative and is a former Associate Dean of Humanities. A former President of the American Forensics Association, she served as Principal Investigator on grants that funded urban debate programs to Atlanta and Milwaukee, including the Computer Assisted Debate Program selected as the signature school program for the 2005 White House’s Helping America’s Youth initiative. She has also served as an invited technical consultant for the U.S. Bureau of Justice Administration to expand the benefits of debate to low-income communities. Her current research program focuses on presidential rhetoric, extremist discourse, and visual arguments related to terrorism. Her book, In the Name of Terrorism (2006), won the National Communication Association’s Outstanding Book Award in Political Communication, and her co-authored article on how certain visual images stand as ideological markers of the culture won that same organization’s Visual Communication Excellence in Research Award. She is currently working as co-principal investigator on a Minerva funded project, ‘Mobilizing Media’, which analyzes the media campaign of violent extremist groups in the Middle East and North Africa.