Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy

ISBN-13: 9780199274123 / Angielski / Twarda / 2005 / 396 str.

Mitchel de S. -O -L'e Lasser

Opis

This book compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.

Recenzje

Lasser's book is a very interesting read..the strength of this fascinating book is to provide novel comparative ways of analysing the ECJ's institutional and interpretative practice. Especially those researching in comparative law, European law and legal discourse theory will profit considerably from this innovative study Hannes Rosler (Max Planck Institute for Foreign Private law and Private International law, Hamburg) International and Comparative Law Quarterly

O autorze

Mitchel de S.-O.-l'E. Lasser is a Visiting Professor at the Cornell Law School, and is Samuel D. Thurman Professor of Law at the University of Utah S. J. Quinney College of Law.