Judicial Application of European Union Law in Post-Communist Countries: The Cases of Estonia and Latvia

ISBN-13: 9781138279117 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 258 str.

Tatjana Evas

Opis

This book discusses how the plurality of legal norms operating in the European Union can be balanced to produce a functioning, sustainable and legitimate legal system. It provides an extensive database of 2004-2009 national judgments of national courts in Latvia and Estonia, and offers an extensive comparative review of the jurisprudence of constitutional and supreme courts, as well as providing insight into the jurisprudence of ordinary national courts. An appealing volume for legal scholars and political scientists studying courts and jurisprudence.

Recenzje

’This is an interesting and thorough analysis of the reception of EU law in Estonia and Latvia. The author examines the adjudication of EU rights before national courts within a sound theoretical framework, casts light on the concept of coherence of EU law, and provides an original case study on the effect of EU law norms to post-communist legal systems. This book is a very valuable addition to the EU law bibliography.’ Takis Tridimas, Queen Mary, University of London, UK ’This book is unique not only because of the sophisticated and in depth analysis of adjudication of EU law by Latvian and Estonian courts but also because of the original manner in which this analysis is embedded in a much broader conceptual framework. The book itself is a breath of fresh air.’ Deirdre Curtin, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands ’Evas’ book has a lot to offer to both lay readers and experts in post-accession legal developments in the new Member States.’ Common Market Law Review

Spis treści

Preface and Acknowledgements; Introduction National Adjudication and the Coherence of the EU Legal System; Part I The Three-Dimensional Coherence Approach; Chapter 1 Conceptual Framework; Part II Intra-System Coherence: Constitutional Structures and Adjudication of EU Law by the Highest National Courts; Chapter 2 Substantive Coherence: Constitutional Structures and Principles; Chapter 3 Institutional Coherence: Interests and Interactions; Chapter 4 Argumentative Coherence: Justifications, Values and Legal Culture; Part III Adjudication of EU Law by the National Ordinary Courts; Chapter 5 Comparative Overview of National Case Law; Chapter 6 Jurisprudence of Estonian Courts; Chapter 7 Jurisprudence of Latvian Courts; Part IV Synthesis and Conclusion; Chapter 8 Domestic Courts and the Application of EU Law: Sources and Methods of Coherence;

O autorze

Dr Tatjana Evas is a Research Fellow at the Jean Monnet Centre for European Studies (CEuS), University of Bremen. From 2000-2002, she was Public Interest Law Initiative Fellow at the Columbia Law School, USA.