Notes on Contributors; Acknowledgements; 1. Introduction: The Rise of Force Short of War; Part I. The Need for Recalibration: 2. Asymmetry in Modern Combat: Explaining the Inadequacy of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello, Jai & Cassitie Galliott; 3. The Fog of War: Violence, Coercion and Jus ad vim, Danielle L. Lupton & Valerie Morkevičius; 4. The Responsibility to Protect and Uses of Force Short of War, Eamon Aloyo; Part II. Options for Recalibration: 5. From Jus ad Bellum to Jus ad Vim: Recalibrating Our Understanding of the Moral Use of Force, Daniel R. Brunstetter & Megan Braun; 6. A Framework for an Ethics of Jus ad Vim in Context of Human Rights, Christopher Ketcham; 7. Jus ad Vim: The Morality of Military and Police Use of Force in Armed Conflicts Short of War, Seumas Miller; 8. Just War Theory, Armed Force Short of War and Escalation to War, John W. Lango; 9. Jus ad Vim and the Question of How to do Just War Theory, Christian Nikolaus Braun & Jai Galliott; Part III. Problems for Recalibration: 10. On the Redundancy of Jus ad Vim: A Response to Daniel Brunstetter and Megan Braun, Helen Frowe; 11. Are Novel Jus ad Vim Principles Needed to Judge Military Measures Short of War?, Shawn Kaplan; 12. Moral Injury, Mission-Drift and Limited War, James Gillcrist & Nick Lloyd; 13. Pacifism and Targeted Killing as a Force Short of War, Nicholas Parkin; 14. In Defence of Jus ad Vim: Why We Need a Moral Framework for the Use of Limited Force, Daniel R. Brunstetter.