First of Many Open Academic Letters

ISBN-13: 9781533410757 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 104 str.

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Opis

This was my first attempt to reach out to Physic academics in my quest to find answers about the truth there has to be in science. This was after I realised that my not understanding had nothing to do with me but it had everything to do with Newtonian science being as crooked as boomerang. These hundred and somewhat pages took all of four years to conclude notwithstanding the simple and elementary arguments I had to come to in order to conclude the eventual finding I made in cosmology. This will enable persons to follow the path of reasoning I took to solve so many unsolved issues in science. Do not let the simplicity fool you because behind these simple mathematical resolves came the understanding I eventually found in how nature works as nature forms the concept of gravity. This was even before I concluded that gravity is the compliment of the Titius Bode law, the Lagrangian points, the Roche limit/ lobe and the Coanda effect. I publish this book in the hope it would help others to get to grips about nature as it helped me more than two decades ago. This was what I wrote just after I broke free from incorrect science mainstream science follows by proving nature holds validity in spite of science trying to diminish and nullify nature or the ultimate role nature plays. Mainstream publishers on science blocks all my attempts because my work destroys Newtonian science. For the first time in human history I manage to prove nature and the way nature applies gravity. In the past no attempt was ever made to prove nature. As long as everybody thinks science is more perfect than God Almighty (and I am not trying to be sacrilegious but just truthful because that is the image science portrays) there is no need for the work I present since there then is no need to scrutinise, that which is perfect. As long as everybody goes around with the concept that science is beyond reproach and is as truthful as religion should be no one will take note about the need or indeed the urgency that my work present but science is in dyer need of reforming very serious mistakes. If Science can't show by physics is. Where science declares that there is not a God that created the cosmos then it is put forward that there is no God Almighty because Science is unable to prove a God. With science regarded as everything that is flawless and absolutely correct there is never even given a thought that it is Science that is too feeble and incorrect to prove the existence of a God or Creator and science with the corruption it is formed by, has not the ability to prove God Almighty. No, the existence of God Almighty comes into question and the question is never brought to the door of the accuracy or the ability of Science. This book is about how incorrect the basis of science is and how nature proves Newton's misconceptions. Science hides Newton's flaws by ignoring and disregarding such flaws However science cannot ignore the Titius Bode law, which I prove, and which forms the solar system This book does precisely what the title says. This book shows how the principles that nature applies at present and throughout time completely destroy all integrity Newton's principles on science claim to have concerning validity or claim there may be on accuracy or any other form of factuality it may have thought to carry. The idea science put forward that nature and Newton fit hand in glove is a myth carried on by mainstream science by never mentioning the differences between nature and Newton. This is ongoing for more than three hundred years but Newtonian, which is accepted science holds as much truth as Newtonian approach to cosmology present in accuracy and that is nothing. Newton's views and claims on physics and what nature applies do not even share a Universe in comparison. I prove deception is deliberately carried out by science. Nature is shown as a joke and reading a short book I hand out for free will embrace and prove what I say with much clarity.

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.