Chapter 2: Being (Un)Ethical in workplaces: the theories and the empirics.
Chapter 3: The system, intrinsic dilemma or the inherent evil - what drives us to be unethical?.
Chapter 4: The Epilogue.
Gagari Chakrabarti obtained M.Sc., M.Phil and Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Calcutta. She is currently serving Presidency University, Kolkata as an Associate Professor in Economics. She has, in her repute, a number of publications in national and international journals and monographs published from international publishing houses. Her research interest lies in the areas of Financial Economics, Financial Econometrics and more recently, in incognitive intelligence.
Tapas Chatterjea is a senior, multi-discipline specialist medical professional. He obtained MBBS (Calcutta), D-Card (Calcutta), MS – psychotherapy & Counselling (Mumbai), M.Phil- Geriatric Medicine (Nagaland), Ph.D.- interdisciplinary medicine (Colombo), PGDSC- stress management (Mumbai), MBA- Hospitality Management (Mumbai), FCCP- chest medicine (New Delhi), PG certification- diabetology (John Hopkins University, USA), PG certification- Thyroid diseases (American thyroid Association, USA), PG certification- inter-disciplinary medicine (Boston University, USA), and additional PG certification from Nabraska University (USA), Harvard University (USA), American Society of Hypertension and American College of gastro enterology.
Gagari Chakrabarti is an Associate Professor in Economics at Presidency University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Her research interest lies in the areas of Financial Economics, Financial Econometrics and more recently, in emotional intelligence.
Tapas Chatterjea is a senior, multi-discipline specialist medical professional. He provides consultancy in Cardio-vascular, Internal, Geriatric, Holistic and Critical care medicines; Diabetology and Thyroid diseases as well as Mental Health, Stress and Hospital Management.
This book explores how the ethically inconsistent behaviour in workplaces can be rooted in moral fibers of the decision-makers, and/or in their varying moral foci depending on the philosophical cornerstones, on which those rest. It explores further whether such decisions may be shaped or modified by contextual factors leading, possibly, to bounded ethicality. Based on a primary survey approaching the academicians, administrators, and other service-holders from India and abroad, it analyses the problem, its determinants and variations across socio-economic and demographic factors.