Termin realizacji zamówienia: ok. 22 dni roboczych.
Darmowa dostawa!
Psychologists, political scientists, and experts in election law present a multidisciplinary perspective on voting.
Personality characteristics such as motivation, values, and efficacy are considered, as are demographic variables such as education, age, and social class
Examines the reciprocal relationship that exists in the functions of voting for individual and society: the interplay between persons and institutions gives rise to the perception that a government is or is not legitimate, and to the sense that an individual does, or does not, belong
Democracy, Voting, and Disenfranchisement in the United States: A Social Psychological Perspective 431 Kevin Lanning
NORMATIVE PERSPECTIVES: THE FUNCTIONS OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
The Psychology of Enfranchisement: Engaging and Fostering Inclusion of Members through Voting and Decision–Making Procedures 447 Celia M. Gonzalez and Tom R. Tyler
A Game–Theoretic View of Voting 467 Joachim I. Brueger and Melissa Acevedo
Electoral Simultaneity: Expressing Equal Respect 487 Dennis F. Thompson
DIFFERENTIAL PERSPECTIVES: CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VOTER
The Psychological and Institutional Determinants of Early Voting 503 Paul Gronke and Daniel Krantz Toffey
Why Do People Vote? A Psychological Analysis of the Causes of Voter Turnout 525 Joshua Harder and Jon A. Krosnick
Beliefs about Deliberation: Personal and Normative Dimensions 551 Eugene Borgida, Keilah A. Worth, Brad Lippmann, Damla Ergun, and James Farr
DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVES: THE ROOTS OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
Political Participation and Cumulative Disadvantage: The Impact of Economic and Social Hardship on Young Citizens 571 Julianna Sandell Pacheco and Eric Pultzer
The "Antidemocratic Personality" Revisited: A Cross–NationalInvestigation of Working–Class Authoritarianism 595 Jaime L. Napier and John T. Jost
Race and Redistricting: What the Print Media Conveys to the Public about the Role of Race 619 Damla Ergun, Grace Deason, Eugene Borgida, and Guy–Uriel Charles
Social Policy, Feminism, and Research on Violence in Close Relationships 665 Irene H. Frieze
Kevin Lanning received his PhD from UC Berkeley and is an Associate Professor of Psychology at the Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University. His research examines personality measurement, personality development and the structure of sociopolitical attitudes. A resident of Palm Beach County, Florida, he is a voting rights activist and the author of a number of editorial pieces on election reform. Lanning recently edited a special issue of the SPSSI electronic journal ASAP on the Social Psychology of the 2004 US Presidential Election.
American democracy depends upon voting, yet for the individual, the benefits of voting appear largely intangible. In the present collection, psychologists, political scientists, and experts in election law present a multidisciplinary perspective on voting. Personality characteristics such as motivation, values, and efficacy are considered, as are demographic variables such as education, age, and social class. Voting is shaped, too, by institutions including schools and the media, and, evidently, by the laws and practices of government. A reciprocal relationship exists in the functions of voting for individual and society: The interplay between persons and institutions gives rise to the perception that a government is or is not legitimate, and to the sense that an individual does, or does not, belong.