3.4.3 Casual Explanations for China’s Non-intervention Policy
3.4.4 Implications of the Causal Mechanisms and Reflections
3.5 Conclusion
References
4 Authorizing Interventions: The Cases of the Gulf War, Afghanistan, and North Korea
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Case 1: Iraq’s Invasion of Kuwait (1990–1991)
4.2.1 Background
4.2.2 China’s Non-intervention Policy Toward the Iraqi-Kuwaiti Issue
4.2.3 Summary
4.3 Case 2: Antiterrorism in Afghanistan (2000–2012)
4.3.1 Background
4.3.2 China’s Foreign Policy Toward Antiterrorism in Afghanistan
4.3.3 Summary
4.4 Case 3: The Sanctions Against North Korea (2006–2017)
4.4.1 Background
4.4.2 International Involvements and China's Responses
4.4.3 Summary
4.5 Conclusion
References
5 Conceding Interventions: The Cases of Crimea, Libya, and Darfur
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Case 4: The Crimean Issue in Ukraine (February–June 2014)
5.2.1 Background
5.2.2 International Responses and China’s Attitude
5.2.3 Summary
5.3 Case 5: The Libyan Conflict (2011)
5.3.1 Background
5.3.2 China’s Responses to the International Interventions
5.3.3 Summary
5.4 Case 6: The Darfur Crisis in Sudan (2004–2007)
5.4.1 Background
5.4.2 Sino-Sudanese Relations
5.4.3 International Responses and China’s Attitude to the Crisis
5.4.4 From Non-intervention to Involvement
5.4.5 Summary
5.5 Conclusion
References
6 Opposing Interventions: The Cases of Kosovo, Syria, and Zimbabwe
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Case 7: The Kosovo Crisis (1998–1999)
6.2.1 Background
6.2.2 International Involvement and China’s Responses
6.2.3 Summary
6.3 Case 8: The Syrian Crisis (2011–2013)
6.3.1 Background
6.3.2 International Interventions in Syria (2011–2014)
6.3.3 China’s Responses to the Syrian Crisis
6.3.4 Summary
6.4 Case 9: Veto on Zimbabwe Issues (2008)
6.4.1 Background
6.4.2 China's Responses to the Situation in Zimbabwe
6.4.3 Summary
6.5 Conclusion
References
7 Conclusion
7.1 Continuity and Change
7.1.1 Non-intervention in International Society
7.1.2 Non-intervention in China’s Interpretation and Diplomacy
7.2 Compliance and Resistance
7.2.1 Causation in China’s Non-intervention Policy
7.2.2 The Applications of the Causation
7.3 Value and Instrument
References
Mu Ren is Assistant Professor of the School of International and Public Affairs and full-time researcher of Institute of International Relations at Jilin University, China. She gives lectures on Theories of International Relations and Global Governance to undergraduate and masters. She received the PhD in International Relations from Ritsumeikan University of Japan. Her research field is broad, including IR theory, Sino-Japanese relations and global governance.
This book investigates China’s foreign policy concerning the principle of non-intervention in domestic affairs of other states in the post-Cold War period. The principle of non-intervention has traditionally been central to Chinese foreign policy, but as China's economy has boomed, international attention to her foreign policy has been increasingly hostile. Accordingly, an exploration of China’s non-intervention policy is worthwhile to understand China’s foreign policy and its international behavior. This book will be of interest to China watchers, scholars of geopolitics, and Asian historians.
Mu Ren is Assistant Professor of the School of International and Public Affairs and full-time researcher of Institute of International Relations at Jilin University, China. She gives lectures on Theories of International Relations and Global Governance to undergraduate and masters. She received the PhD in International Relations from Ritsumeikan University of Japan. Her research field is broad, including IR theory, Sino-Japanese relations and global governance.