3.2. Repentance: Renouncing Current Witness and Embracing a New One
3.3. Counter-Apocalyptic Witness and Relational Becoming
3.4. “Do this in My Remembrance”—Witness as Eucharistic Living
3.5. Substitutionary Atonement that Prevents any Theological Response
3.5.1. Ontological Difference Instituted by the Concept of Human
Resource Management
3.6. Constructedness of all Religions, and the
Witness of God and Christians
3.6.1. Relativization of Religions
3.6.2. Witness: Not posturing to leap, but always already leaping
3.6.3. Jesus sans Life, Barth sans Barmen
3.7. Conclusion
CHAPTER 4: WITNESS OF GOD AND THE RISK OF PROCLAMATION
4.1. Matthew’s Manifesto on Becoming Witnesses and Living Reflexively
4.1.1. Turn and Become like Children: Begin Living
without Eschatological Missions
4.1.2. Making Disciples, Baptizing, and Teaching
4.2. Seize the Miracles and Seek Resurrection
4.3. Law versus Faith: “Justification by Faith” Re-imagined
4.4. Marturion Dei and the Marturia of the Disciples
4.5. Conclusion
CONCLUSION: BEHOLD THE MARTURION DEI, WITNESS COURAGEOUSLY,
AND HAVE LIFE ABUNDANTLY
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Sarosh Koshy holds a PhD in Christian theology from Drew University, USA. He is a researcher with decades-long work experience with social action groups, faith organizations, and social movements, both in India and the US, and is currently based in New York, USA.
In this book, Sarosh Koshy strives to go beyond the mission model of Christianity that emerged alongside and within the colonial enterprise and ethos since the sixteenth century. Rather than denounce the inheritance of the mission movement that transformed both the church and world in innumerable ways, it is a simultaneous expression of appreciation for this precious heritage, and an attempt to do justice by it through a yearning quest for relevant paradigms of Christian engagement.
Indeed, there is an intense tension within this book, and in fact a twin tension at that. The tension is between those seeking to keep the current mission paradigm alive out of habit or as a self-serving device, thus corrupting and withering away a bequeathal that essentially set free the voluntary/independent spirit of Christian individuals and their intentional collectives from both the ecclesiastical and political authorities. On the other side are those who enlist mission both as a subsequent activity and as a basis to pursue innocuous, and at times apparently heroic options that would seemingly satisfy a supposed missional mandatory.
This work enlists postcolonial and poststructuralist resources pedagogically, to teach of mission, missiology, World Christianity, and intercultural theology.