Antisemitism Before and Since the Holocaust: Altered Contexts and Recent Perspectives

ISBN-13: 9783319488653 / Angielski / Twarda / 2017 / 406 str.

Anthony McElligott; Jeffrey Herf

Opis

Divided into five discrete sections, this book examines the issue of Holocaust denial, and in some cases "Holocaust inversion" in North America, Europe, and the Middle East and its relationship to the history of antisemitism before and since the Holocaust. It thus offers both a historical and contemporary perspective. This volume includes observations by leading scholars, delivering powerful, even controversial essays by scholars who are reporting from the frontline. It offers a discussion on the relationship between Christianity and Islam, as well as the historical and contemporary issues of antisemitism in the USA, Europe, and the Middle East. This book explores how all of these issues contribute consciously or otherwise to contemporary antisemitism. The chapters of this volume do not necessarily provide a unity of argument nor should they. Instead, they expose the plurality of positions within the academy and reflect the robust discussions that occur on the subject. "

Recenzje

"This book, as the title suggests, is an analysis of antisemitism both before the Holocaust and after. ... This book was an excellent analysis of this issue. While some would deny that the Holocaust happened, this could not be further from the truth. The Holocaust was one of the most poignant events of human history in religion. This book did a good job analyzing antisemitism for what it is: racism." (Justin Dilliplane, Resolved for Christ, resolvedfc.blogspot.de, January, 2018)

Spis treści

1. Introduction

I. Two Preliminary Observations

2. A Few Observations on Holocaust Denial and Antisemitism

3. Antisemitism and Holocaust Inversion

II. Religion

4. An 'Indelible Stigma?' Christianity and Antisemitism

5. 'Every Sane Thinker Must be an Anti-Semite:' Antisemitism and Holocaust Denial in the Theology of Radical Catholic Traditionalists

6. Religion, Prejudice and Annihilation: The Case of Traditional Islamic Judeophobia and its Transformation into the Modern Islamist Antisemitism

III. Historical and Contemporary Political Arenas

7. Jews, Engagement in the Nation-State and Political Antisemitism

8. Nazi Propaganda to the Arab World during World War II and the Holocaust and its After Effects

9. Iranian Anti-Antisemitism and the Holocaust

10. Antisemitism in Contemporary Germany

11. Antisemitism in Britain: Continuity and the Absence of a Resurgence?

IV. Metaphor and Discourse

12. 'Stealing the Holocaust from the Jews?' - The Holocaust as a Metaphor in the Public Discourse

13. Soft Denial in Different Political and Social Areas on the Web

V. Two Further Observations

14. Five Reflections on Holocaust Denial and the De-legitimation of Israel

15. Ex Malo Bono: Does this Latin Proverb Apply to Holocaust Denial? The Cunning of Reason.

O autorze

Anthony McElligott is founding Professor of History and Head of Department at the University of Limerick, Ireland. 

Jeffrey Herf is Distinguished University Professor in the Department of History at the University of Maryland in College Park. 

Blurb

Divided into five discrete sections, this book not only broaches the issue of Islamist denial of the Holocaust in the Middle East but also attempts to understand the Western paradox by looking at antisemitism before and since the Holocaust in Europe and the United States. It thus offers both a historical and contemporary perspective. This volume includes observations by leading scholars, delivering powerful, even controversial essays by scholars who are reporting from the ‘frontline.’ It offers a discussion on the relationship between Christianity and Islam, as well as the historical and contemporary issues of antisemitism in the USA, Europe, and the Middle East. This book explores how all of these issues contribute consciously or otherwise to contemporary antisemitism. The chapters of this volume do not necessarily provide a unity of argument – nor should they. Instead, they expose the plurality of positions within the academy and reflect the robust discussions that occur on the subject.