An open letter about ?Gravity's Prescription?

ISBN-13: 9781535085915 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 572 str.

Peet (P S. J. ). Schutte

Opis

Notwithstanding the pose Mainstream physics tries to uphold, the entirety of physics still use the idea of magical forces intervening in nature and they still base concepts on unexplained novelties. To say the least, the concepts physics use in terms of Newton would not even be acceptable to children in the modern informed era we live in, I challenge any person to prove Newton, not to accept Newton but to undoubtedly prove Newton correct I recognised the impossible double standards Mainstream physics apply to promote their much shady explaining. In short I tested Newton's principles and found the principles to be wanting. The inconsistencies Newton introduced brought science double vision and to compensate for these bogus truths supporting their incredible theories, they simplify issues to such a level where what they embark on, is the meaningless acceptance of the unproven and they proclaim to understand what are meaningless inconsistencies and to achieve this they create scenarios which use the entanglement of deception. What they declare as unwavering facts can't even be supported in the least form when tested. It is as if they never read with interest that which they explain and they never scrutinise that which they advocate. To most if not to all of the persons reading this and just the thought about me embarking on the investigation of the issue is totally senseless to investigate. It is senseless because the concept it carries became accepted as household practise and life science. The worst part is that the group of people normally considered as the wisest bunch there is, never did prudent testing on Newtonian presumptions, while to test the presumptions is most easy to do. I will not believe that a lot that lives up to the veneer of being the best mathematical intellectuals on Earth, never though of testing Newton's very simple formula and in that disregard the formula because of the incorrectness the formula holds. If you think those in charge of astrophysics are the pillars of trust, then get wise by reading the following. This religion that they practise of self promotion is of a level where they show self regard that belongs in a status of being next to God. This trust we have is brought on by a culture of trusting the King to do the people well and somewhere in every person's cultural past there were Kings that did us well in leadership. But their underestimation of our abilities is the testimony of their poor understanding and their weak insight ability which results from their arrogance and stupidity. This betrayal on their part and misusing the public's good nature to be used in schemes to get the public conned must end and I pray that this book form the first step in resisting the arrogance of the Academic Physicist' will be successful in that regard. Any one not in their group of the Academic Physicist is part of the lowest order of mindless being and to become part of their order and those that have minds with an ability to think, students have to accept what they say when they say whatever they wish to say without having to prove the correctness of what should back their saying so and as a result of this students may never question what they say. The sifting process they named examinations. Then you better read on and I will remove your blindfold and show you what a world of deception the Academic Physicist force on us. If you are a student in the science of physics, then ask your Educated Masters to please explain the following abnormalities you are about to read in this book and insist on a clear explanation about the inconsistencies they promote while tutoring physics as if the physics they present are the most flawless and accurate institution there has ever been. Let them mathematically show how one would go about and use Newton's visionary formula to calculate the force of gravity by replacing the symbols with the actual values in mass that the items refer to have.

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.