An Interpersonal Pragmatic Study of Professional Identity Construction in Chinese Televised Debating Discourse

ISBN-13: 9789811675041 / Angielski / Twarda / 2021 / 204 str.

Chengtuan Li

Opis

This book explores debaters’ professional identity construction through implicit negation in televised debates from an interpersonal pragmatic perspective. It reveals the linguistic strategies used to indirectly negate the identity of others, and highlights three pairs of professional identity constructed through implicit negation: (1) expert vs. non-expert identity, (2) outsider vs. insider identity, (3) authentic vs. false identity. Furthermore, it proposes the Inter-relationality Principle, self-through-other identity and other-through-self identity, which contribute to Bucholtz and Hall’s theory of identity construction. Lastly, the book discusses the relations between professional identity construction through implicit negation and im/politeness, and builds a model of professional identity construction through implicit negation based on interpersonal pragmatics. By focusing on the interpersonal pragmatics of professional identity construction, the book advances the interpersonal pragmatic study of identity construction, im/politeness and implicit negation. As such, it is a valuable resource for a broad readership, including graduate students, and scholars who are interested in professional identity construction, implicit negation and im/politeness research.

Spis treści

Abstract

Figures and Tables

Contents

Chapter One Introduction

1.1 The object of the study

1.2 Rationale of the study

1.3 Objectives of the study

1.4 The outline of the study

Chapter Two Methodology of the Study

2.1 Introduction

2.2 Data collection and transcription conventions

2.2.1 Data collection

2.2.2 The transcription conventions

2.2.3 Advantages and disadvantages of the data

2.3 Features of televised debating programmes

2.3.1 Institutional roles and their respective tasks

2.3.2 Topic of current affairs of televised debating programmes

2.3.3 Institution-specific goals of televised debating programmes

2.4. Analytical tools and procedures of the data

Chapter Three Literature Review

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Approaches to identity construction

3.2.1 Identity study following the sociolinguistic approach

3.2.1.1 The social constructionism approach

3.2.1.2 The narrative approach

3.2.2 Identity study in conversation analysis

3. 2. 3 Identity study from a psychological perspective

3.2.3.1 Social identity theory

3.2.3.2 Positioning theory and positioning analysis

3.2.3.2.1 Positioning theory

3.2.3.2.2 Positioning analysis

3.2.4 Identity study using the pragmatic approach

3.2.4.1 Identity construction and its markers

3.2.4.2 Identity, face and im/politeness

3.3 Implicit negation

3.4 Achievements and limitations in the prior studies

3.5 Summary

Chapter Four The Conceptual Framework

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Working definition of professional identity construction

4.2.1 Intentionality

4.2.2 Multiplicity

4.2.3 Relationality

4.3 Delimitation of professional identity construction via implicit negation

4.3.1 Identity construction and positioning

4.3.2 Identity construction and facework

4.3.3 Identity construction and category

4.4 Theoretical Support

4.4.1 Giles & Powesland’s Accommodation Theory

4.4.2 Spencer-Oatey’s Rapport Management Theory

4.4.2.1 Components of rapport management

4.4.2.2 Rapport orientations

4.4.3 Bucholtz & Hall’s Theory of Identity and Interaction

4.5 The conceptual framework of the present research

4.5.1 Implicit negation of other-identity in interaction

4.5.2 Categorization of professional identity construction via implicit negation

4.5.3 Professional identity construction via implicit negation and im/politeness

4.6 Summary

Chapter Five Implicit Negation of Other-Identity in Interaction

5.1 Introduction

5.2 The accommodative strategies for implicit negation

5. 2.1 Convergences for implicit negation

5.2.1.1 Positive convergences for implicit negation

5.2.1.1.1 Deprecating self-identity

5.2.1.1.2 Token acknowledgement of other-identity

5.2.1.2 Negative convergences for implicit negation

5.2.1.2.1 Re-defining other-identity

5.2.1.2.2 Innuendo of other-identity

5.2.2 Divergence strategies for implicit negation

5.2.2.1 Positive divergences for implicit negation

5.2.2.1.1 Drawing an analogy

5.2.2.1.2Turning to the 3rd non/present party

5.2.2.1.3 Explicit self-identification

5.2.2.1.4 Utilizing indexical shifts or depersonalization

5.2.2.2 Negative divergences for implicit negation

5.2.2.2.1 Drawing an analogy via improper vocatives

5.2.2.2.2 Rhetorical questions

5.2.2.2.3 Using a tautology

5.3 A model of implicit negation of other-identity

5.4 Conclusion

Chapter Six Professional Identity Construction via Implicit Negation

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Expert identity versus non-expert identity construction

6.2.1 Overt mention of identity categories and labels

6.2.2. Projecting self-professional competence

6.2.2.1 Projecting self-professional competence with rhetorical strategies

6.2.2.2 Challenging the other’s professional competence

6.2.2.3 Presenting hypothetical roles/situations

6.3 Insider identity versus outsider identity construction

6.3.1 Outsider identity construction

6.3.2 Insider identity construction

6.4. Authentic identity versus false identity construction

6.4.1 Crafted identity construction

6.4.2 Problematic identity construction

6.4.3 Fragmented identity construction

6.5 A model of professional identity construction via implicit negation

6.6 Summary

Chapter Seven Professional identity construction via implicit negation and im/politeness

7.1 Introduction

7.2 Identity and im/politeness

7.3 Identity construction and im/politeness in institutional discourse

7.4 Professional identity construction and im/politeness in institutional discourse

7.4.1 Verification of the other-identity and politeness-enhancement via positive convergences

7.4.2 Partial verification of the other’s identity and politeness-maintenance via negative convergences

7.4.3 Non-verification of other-identity and politeness-maintenance via positive divergences

7.4.3.1 Non-verification of the other’s quality face and politeness

7.4.3.2 Non-verification of the other’s social identity face and politeness

7.4.4 Non-recognition of the other’s sociality rights and impoliteness via negative divergences

7.5 Mechanism for professional identity construction via implicit negation and im/politeness in institutional discourse

7.6 Summary

Chapter Eight Conclusion

8.1 Introduction

8.2 Major findings

8.2.1 Categories of professional identity constructed via implicit negation

8.2.2 Implicit strategies of negating other-identity

8.2.3 Relationships of professional identity construction via implicit negation and im/politeness

8.4 Implications

8.5 Limitations

8. 6 Suggestions for future research

Reference

O autorze

Li Chengtuan is a professor of linguistics at the Faculty of English Language and Culture, and a researcher at the Center of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, P. R. China. His recent research covers pragmatics and discourse analysis, especially identity construction, im/politeness, moral norm and cross-cultural communication. He has published papers in the Journal of Pragmatics, Text & Talk, Intercultural Pragmatics, and Pragmatics & Society, as well as book chapters with Routledge.