An Inquiry Into the Nature of Aesthetic Theory in Its Relation to Theory of Knowledge in Kant's Critical Philosophy

ISBN-13: 9783631817513 / Angielski / Miękka / 2020 / 240 str.

Guven OEZDOYRAN

Opis

The book investigates Kant's aesthetic theory and its problematic relation to theory of knowledge in his transcendental philosophy. It discusses the nature of Kant's aesthetic theory and that constitute a pure aesthetic judgment of reflection and attempts to clarify its proper place in critical philosophy regarding his theory of knowledge.

Spis treści

Acknowledgments ............................................................................................. 11

1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 13

2 Kant's Theory of Reflective Judgment .................................................. 19

2.1. General Description of Reflective Judgment ........................................... 19

2.2. The Problematic Relation between Reflective and Determinative

Judgments ..................................................................................................... 22

2.2.1. Further Remarks on the Issue .......................................................... 28

2.3. The Structure of Kant's Exposition of the Introductions ....................... 32

2.4. The Principle of Purposiveness, the Principle of Systematicity

and Nature: The Need for Reflective Judgment ....................................... 33

2.5. The Supplementary Notions: Technic of Nature, the Specification

of Nature, Analogy and Symbol ................................................................ 46

2.6. Kant's Problematic Transition from the Principle of

Purposiveness and the Principle of Systematicity to the Aesthetic

Theory ........................................................................................................... 57

2.7. The Arguments on the Problematic Relation between the Theory

of Reflective Judgment and the Aesthetic Judgment of Reflection ....... 60

3 Kant's Theory of Aesthetic Judgment of Reflection ....................... 75

3.1. General Description of Aesthetic Judgment of Reflection .................... 75

3.2. Disinterested Nature of Aesthetic Judgment of Reflection .................... 78

3.3. Subjective Universality: The Universal Voice .......................................... 81

3.3.1. "The Key to the Critique of Taste": The First Rupture .................. 87

3.3.1.1. The Two-Acts View or the Double Process

of Reflection ......................................................................... 91
3.3.1.2. The Counter-Arguments to the Two-Acts View

and Alternative Explanations ........................................... 100

3.4. Kant's Aesthetic Formalism: The Subjective Formal

Purposiveness as the Purposiveness without a Purpose ...................... 106

3.4.1. Definitions and the Problem of Causal Relation: The

Second Rupture ............................................................................... 107

3.4.2. Transcendental Aesthetic and the Matter of "Aesthetic Form" . 114

3.5. Exemplary Necessity and Sensus Communis ........................................ 124

3.6. The Harmony of the Cognitive Faculties as the Great Narrative

without a Narrative: The Third Rupture ................................................. 129

3.6.1. Deduction and Kant's Expositions ................................................ 130

3.6.2. Exemplary Arguments for the Harmony of the Cognitive

Faculties ............................................................................................ 137

4 Stage I: Re-Considering the Faculties: Imagination (and

Understanding) ............................................................................................ 149

4.1. General Descriptions ................................................................................ 149

4.2. The Position of Imagination in "A" Deduction ...................................... 151

4.3. The Position of Imagination in "B" Deduction ..................................... 155

4.3.1. Figurative Synthesis and Intellectual Synthesis ........................... 160

4.4. Schematism and the Implications of the Synthesis of Imagination .... 164

4.4.1. The Difference between the Apprehension of an Event and

the Apprehension of an Object ...................................................... 168

4.5. Re-Examination of the Free Harmony of the Cognitive

Faculties: The Last Attempt ...................................................................... 172

4.6. Concluding Remarks ................................................................................ 194

5 Stage II: Re-Considering the Faculties: Reason (and

Understanding) ............................................................................................ 197

5.1. Reason and Its Relation to Understanding in the System of

Transcendental Dialectic .......................................................................... 197

5.2. Transcendental Ideas as the Pure Concepts of Reason ........................ 202
5.3. Cosmological Ideas and the Synthesis of Conditions .......................... 205

5.3.1. The Distinction between Mathematical Synthesis and

Dynamical Synthesis ....................................................................... 207

5.4. Reason as a Higher Faculty: Regulative Employment of the Ideas ..... 212

5.5. Re-Examination of the Principles and the Nature as the Ground

for the Reflective Judgment ..................................................................... 220

5.6. Concluding Remarks ................................................................................ 224

6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 227

Bibliography ....................................................................................................... 235

O autorze

Güven Özdoyran studied philosophy at Middle East Technical University (METU) in Turkey. He received his doctoral degree from METU and continues his academic studies at Istanbul Arel University, Faculty of Communication. His current research areas are communication theory, media and cultural studies, sociology of communication.