Outcomes-Based Program Review: Closing Achievement Gaps In- And Outside the Classroom with Alignment to Predictive Analytics and Performance Metrics

ISBN-13: 9781620362303 / Angielski / Miękka / 2018 / 264 str.

Marilee J. Bresciani Ludvik

Opis

Introduces the reader to the principles of assessment of student learning outcomes in the context of program review, and illustrates how to implement a sustainable outcomes-based assessment program review process based on over 30 case studies of exemplary practice across a range of institutional types.

Recenzje

“In the second edition of Marilee’s book on outcomes-based assessment program review, she brings a renewed focus to achievement for all students, as well as connections between outcomes conversations and predictive analytics along with other potentially performance enhancing technologies. While there is much debate about the role of technology in higher education, outcomes in general, the seemingly decreasing value of a degree, as well as the criteria upon which higher education should be judged and held accountable, Marilee’s book offers a breath of fresh air and a meaningful way forward.

Viewing outcomes conversations as part of a learning organization that focuses upon asking ‘the right’ questions about our practice, she presents a non-prescriptive process focused on reflection, collaboration, and adaptability. She reminds us that it is through conversations, space, and time for reflection that we can foster processes not based in compliance, but in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data in ways that matter to individual institutions.

This book is useful for anyone within higher education interested in sustainable outcomes-based approaches with clear examples and tools drawn from the field. Presenting peer reviewed criteria for good practice, useful appendices, and an honest discussion regarding ongoing questioning of processes along with barriers to good practice, this book is a welcome addition to the conversation.”

Natasha Jankowski, Director, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA); Research Assistant Professor, Education Policy, Organization, and Leadership (EPOL)

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

"The new edition of Outcomes-Based Program Review is a timely gift for higher education. Its emphasis on the science and the art of assessment, coupled with the overarching importance of evidence for learning – not simply demonstrated student learning but demonstrated organizational learning - is imperative and welcome. Every person at a higher education organization can locate some way to contribute to achieving enhanced student success through the clear, comprehensive guidance set forth."

Terrel L. Rhodes, Vice President, Office of Quality, Curriculum and Assessment Executive Director of VALUE

Association of American Colleges and Universities

“As a former colleague of Dr. Marilee Bresciani Ludvik at both North Carolina State University and Texas A&M University, I can speak with authority about her expertise and commitment to the exploration of outcomes-based assessment in the context of program review. In her new book she has stressed the practical application of what for many is a daunting challenge: linking the worlds of outcomes assessment, program review, predictive analytics, and competency-based education. Moreover, she extends her analysis to a broader institutional context suggesting that an institution cannot assert that it is a learning-centered institution if it does not link critical aspects of academic affairs, student services, faculty development, and professional staff development. As in her previous written work Marilee asks the reader to formulate and consider key questions and to review the best practices and best models. Her work is an absolute necessity for institutions like mine who will soon undergo its 10-year SACSCOC accreditation.”

James A. Anderson, Chancellor & Professor of Psychology

Fayetteville State University

"Colleges and universities in the United States expanded rapidly in the twentieth century in response to the need to provide access to higher education and training to a greater percentage of an increasing population. While the most elite universities focused on scholarship and the production of knowledge, giving students an opportunity to learn was the most significant mission for most colleges and universities. However, the institutions took no responsibility for the learning and success of their students. A common philosophy in the 1960s was “students have a right to fail,” meaning colleges should give students a chance, but institutions have no responsibility for their success or failure—that was up to the student.

Over the past thirty years, there has been a significant shift in the mission of higher education. Today’s colleges and universities are being asked to be accountable not only for access for students but also for outcomes including student learning, degree completion, and equity. Measuring success outcomes is much more difficult and controversial than measuring student enrollment, and the efforts have sometimes been contentious. In the second edition of Outcomes-Based Program Review, Dr. Marilee Bresciani Ludvik provides roadmaps and lessons learned that can guide today’s educators in the use of data and predictive analytics to improve student success and to close achievement gaps. As Dr. Ludvik reminds us, as discussions about learning outcomes continue, educators should be careful not to fall into the trap of making their purpose just about a report to satisfy an accrediting commission or a state agency. Institutional improvement is much more important than mandated reports."

George R. Boggs, Superintendent/President Emeritus, Palomar College, President and CEO Emeritus, American Association of Community Colleges, Chair, Phi Theta Kappa Board of Directors

"If our institutions of higher education are truly institutions of learning, we must dedicate ourselves to learning from our primary practice. We must seek to improve continuously the extent to which our programs generate evidence of learning. This splendid book is a great place to start."

Joe Johnson, Executive Director of the National Center for Urban School Transformation and the QUALCOMM Professor of Urban Education

San Diego State University

"Outcomes assessment in higher education is a magnet for criticism, in large part because too often the effort does not yield meaningful, actionable information. This refreshed volume is a timely antidote of sorts, distilling lessons learned about best practices from scores of schools doing assessment right to persuasively explain why and expertly illustrate how the essential work of collecting and using evidence of student learning can benefit students, faculty and staff, institutions, and the public."

George D. Kuh, Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus of Higher Education, Indiana University, Senior Scholar, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment

"For Ludvik the systematic and reflective inquiry process involved in developing a program review and the content of it are essential to an institution that has become or seeks to become a learning organization. Useful reviews developed according to Ludvik’s guidance and plethora of examples and resources provide lens through which institutional leaders can continuously explore how well the departments, programs, and services of their institution are achieving two major goals: (1) fulfillment of institutional mission and purposes at demonstrably high-quality levels and (2) preparation of all students to achieve the high-quality learning outcomes necessary to contribute to the demands of the 21st-Century. Ludvik’s second edition has now become THE most comprehensive resource for effectively developing institutionally useful program reviews at all levels across a college, university, or a system."

Peggy Maki is a writer and higher education consultant specializing in assessing student learning

“The two 'A’s' by which higher education is evaluated today are ACCOUNTABILITY and ASSESSMENT. This book has laid out a very effective case for using assessment in response to the cry for accountability from all constituents of higher education. From Congress to accreditors, employers and the general public, this book can be easily used to help all parties better understand how institutions use assessment to ensure a quality education is being provided to its students.”

Belle S. Wheelan, President

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges

Spis treści

Tables and Figures Foreword—Ralph Wolf Preface. How to Use This Book Acknowledgments 1. Why. It’s About Becoming a Learning Organization 2. What. Defining Outcomes-Based Assessment Program Review 3. More Why and What of Outcomes-Based Assessment Program Review 4. Criteria for Good Practice Outcomes-Based Assessment Program Review 5. How and When. Key Questions to Consider When Implementing Good Practice Outcomes-Based Assessment Program Review 6. Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Good Practice Outcomes-Based Assessment Program Review Appendixes References About the Author Index

O autorze

Marilee J. Bresciani Ludvik is Professor for Postsecondary Education and Co-Director of the Center for Educational Leadership, Innovation, and Policy, San Diego State University. She was formerly Assistant Vice President for Institutional Assessment at Texas A&M University. She has conducted outcomes assessment for programs and courses and is frequently invited to present assessment workshops nationally and internationally.

Ralph Wolff is President of the Senior College Commission of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC), a role he assumed in 1996. Prior to joining WASC, he founded and directed the Institute for Creative Thinking, which focused on leadership and change, an emphasis that has carried over to his work at WASC. During his term as president, he has led WASC to the forefront of accreditation as an agent of accountability and innovation by transforming the accreditation process to an outcomes and learning based model. His current efforts at the Commission include a redesign of the accreditation process that focuses on retention and graduation, defining degree outcomes more clearly, and opening the accreditation process to greater transparency.