Notes on Contributors Introduction
James P. Grimshaw
Part I: Overview
1: Can One Really Be an Exegete and Claim that All Exegeses are Equally Legitimate – Timothy Gombis, Independent Scholar, USA
2: Three Commentaries, One Author: One Author Shaped by History and Culture – Robert L. Brawley, McCormick Theological Seminary, USA
Part II: Methodology and Ethical Responsibility
3: Ethical Responsibility and the Necessity to Choose Among a Plurality of Equally Legitimate and Plausible Interpretations – Kathy Ehrensperger, University of Potsdam, Germany
4: Unending Interpretations: Continuing the Conversation – Tat-siong Benny Liew, College of the Holy Cross, USA
5: The Collision of Adverse Opinions: A Reflection on Daniel Patte, John Stuart Mill, and the Absolutization of Certainty – Monya A. Stubbs, Chicago Theological Seminary, USA
6: Can We Live With Romans After Auschwitz? – Gary A. Phillips, Wabash College, USAPart III: Romans 1:16-18 and 1:26-27
7: A Chinese Cross-Cultural Reading of “d??a??s??? ?e??” In Romans 1:17: A Plausible Fourth Exegesis in Conversation With Daniel Patte – K. K. Yeo, Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary, USA
8: A Historical Analysis of Daniel Patte’s Strategies and Ethics of Reading With a Focus on Romans 1:16–18 and 1:26–27 – Bernadette J. Brooten, Brandeis University, USAPart IV: Future Application and Past Influence
9: Patte’s Romans in the Classroom: Can the Introduction and Chapter 1 Provide Students an Entrée into Postmodern Hermeneutic Theory and Practice? – John Jones, La Sierra University, USA
10: The Taproot of My Perception of Romans as Necessarily Multivalent and Contextual – Daniel Patte, Vanderbilt University, USAReferences
Author Index