The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I : A New Framework for Architecture

ISBN-13: 9780470772997 / Angielski / Twarda / 2010 / 478 str.

Patrik S Schumacher

Opis

Take a theoretical approach to architecture with The Autopoiesis of Architecture, which presents the topic as a discipline with its own unique logic. Architecture's conception of itself is addressed as well as its development within wider contemporary society. Author Patrik Schumacher offers innovative treatment that enriches architectural theory with a coordinated arsenal of concepts facilitating both detailed analysis and insightful comparisons with other domains, such as art, science and politics. He explores how the various modes of communication comprising architecture depend upon each other, combine, and form a unique subsystem of society that co-evolves with other important autopoietic subsystems like art, science, politics and the economy. The first of two volumes that together present a comprehensive account of architecture's autopoiesis, this book elaborates the theory of architecture's autopoeisis in 8 parts, 50 sections and 200 chapters. Each of the 50 sections poses a thesis drawing a central message from the insights articulated within the respective section. The 200 chapters are gathering and sorting the accumulated intelligence of the discipline according to the new conceptual framework adopted, in order to catalyze and elaborate the new formulations and insights that are then encapsulated in the theses. However, while the theoretical work in the text of the chapters relies on the rigorous build up of a new theoretical language, the theses are written in ordinary language ? with the theoretical concepts placed in brackets. The full list of the 50 theses affords a convenient summary printed as appendix at the end of the book. The second volume completes the analysis of the discourse and further proposes a new agenda for contemporary architecture in response to the challenges and opportunities that confront architectural design within the context of current societal and technological developments.

Spis treści

Preface.

0 Introduction: Architecture as Autopoietic System.

0.1 Architecture as a System of Communications.

0.2 A Unified Theory of Architecture.

0.3 Functional vs Causal Explanations.

0.4 The Quest for Comprehensiveness.

0.5 The Premises Imported from Social Systems Theory.

0.6 Architecture′s Place within Society.

1 Architectural Theory.

1.1 The Unity of Architecture.

1.1.1 Architectural System–formation and Self–regulation.

1.2 The Evolution of Architecture.

1.2.1 Architectural Theory as Mechanism of Selection.

1.3 The Necessity of Theory.

1.3.1 The Function of Architectural Theory.

1.3.2 Types of Theories.

1.3.3 The Necessity to Reflect Architecture′s Societal raison d′etre.

1.3.4 Super–theories.

1.3.5 The Theory of Architectural Autopoiesis as Domain–specific Super–theory.

1.3.6 From Deconstruction to the Programme of Critical Theory.

2 The Historical Emergence of Architecture.

2.1 The Emergence of Architecture as Self–referential System.

2.1.1 Inside–descriptions vs Outside–descriptions.

2.1.2 Function Systems.

2.1.3 The Historical Crystallization of Architecture.

2.2 Foundation and Refoundation of Architecture.

2.2.1 Autonomization: The Origin of the Discipline in the Italian Renaissance.

2.2.2 The Refoundation of the Discipline as Modern Architecture.

2.2.3 The Exclusive Competency and Universal Scope of Modern Architecture.

2.2.4 The Liberation from Traditional Formal Constraints.

2.2.5 The Switch from Edifice to Space.

2.3 Avant–garde vs Mainstream.

2.3.1 A Prerequisite for Evolution.

2.3.2 The Autonomy of the Avant–garde.

2.3.3 Communications between Avant–garde and Mainstream.

2.3.4 The Reciprocal Dependency between Avant–garde and Mainstream.

2.3.5 The Time Structure of the Avant–garde Process: Cumulative vs Revolutionary Periods.

2.3.6 Concrete Exemplars vs Abstract Principles.

2.3.7 Revolution and Philosophy.

2.3.8 Latent Utopias vs the Utopian Ambitions of the Historical Avant–garde.

2.3.9 Retroactive Manifestos.

2.4 Architectural Research.

2.4.1 Architectural Research as Avant–garde Design Research.

2.4.2 Architecture Schools as Laboratories.

2.5 The Necessity of Demarcation.

2.5.1 The Differentiation of Art and Architecture.

2.5.2 The Differentiation of Science and Architecture.

2.5.3 The Differentiation of Architecture and Engineering.

2.5.4 The Rationality of Demarcation.

2.5.5 The Specificity of Architecture within the Design Disciplines.

3 Architecture as Autopoietic System Operations, Structures and Processes.

3.1 Architectural Autopoiesis within Functionally Differentiated Society.

3.1.1 Niklas Luhmann s Theory of Modern Society.

3.1.2 Third Order Observation.

3.1.3 Codes and Media.

3.1.4 The Concept of Social Autopoiesis.

3.2 The Autonomy of Architecture.

3.2.1 Openness through Closure.

3.2.2 Irritations.

3.2.3 Communication Structures.

3.3 The Elemental Operation of Architecture.

3.3.1 Design Decisions.

3.3.2 Network–dependency of Elemental Operations.

3.3.3 Design Decisions and External Demands.

3.4 The Lead–distinction within Architecture and the Design Disciplines.

3.4.1 The Primacy of Distinctions.

3.4.2 Form vs Function as the Lead–distinction within the Design Disciplines.

3.4.3 The Double Reference of the Design Disciplines.

3.5 The Codification of Architecture.

3.5.1 Binary Codes.

3.5.2 Utility and Beauty as the Double Code of Architecture.

3.5.3 Polycontexturality.

3.5.4 The Unique Double Code of Architecture as Demarcation Device.

3.5.5 The Double Code of Architecture and the Triple Code of Avant–garde Architecture.

3.5.6 Discursive Oscillation: Coping with an Expanding Universe of Possibility.

3.5.7 Abstraction and Openness.

3.6 Architectural Styles.

3.6.1 The Concept of Style(s).

3.6.2 The Rationality of Style(s).

3.6.3 Styles as the Necessary Programmes of Architecture.

3.6.4 Styles Regulate Form and Function.

3.6.5 Reluctant Styles.

3.6.6 The Inescapability of the Formal A Priori.

3.6.7 The Double Contingency of Style Formation.

3.6.8 Stylistic Awareness as Second Order Observation.

3.6.9 Progress as Progression of Styles.

3.7 Styles as Research Programmes.

3.7.1 The Creativity of Styles/Research Programmes.

3.7.2 The Tenacity of Styles/Research Programmes.

3.7.3 The Structure of Styles/Research Programmes: Autonomy, Hard Core, Heuristics.

3.7.4 The Great Historical Styles: Hard Core and Heuristics.

3.7.5 Problem Domain and Solution Space as Sources of Stylistic Innovation.

3.7.6 Paradigmatic Mainline and Speculative Extrapolation.

3.7.7 Progressive vs Degenerate Styles/Research Programmes.

3.7.8 Methodological Tolerance.

3.8 The Rationality of Aesthetic Values.

3.8.1 The Historical Transformation of Aesthetic Values.

3.8.2 Aesthetic Values and the Code of Beauty.

3.8.3 The Mystery of Beauty.

3.8.4 Formal A Priori, Idiom and Aesthetic Values.

3.8.5 The Necessity of Aesthetic Revolutions.

3.8.6 Aesthetic Values: Designers vs Users.

3.9 The Double–nexus of Architectural Communications: Themes vs Projects.

3.9.1 The Unity of the Difference between Themes and Projects.

3.9.2 The Difference between Themes and Projects.

3.9.3 The Interaction between Themes and Projects.

4 The Medium of Architecture.

4.1 Medium and Form.

4.1.1 Symbolically Generalized Media of Communication.

4.1.2 The Medium as Revealing and Concealing.

4.1.3 The Medium as Universe of Possibilities.

4.1.4 Medium and Manner.

4.1.5 The Standard Medium of Architecture.

4.1.6 Recursive Self–reference.

4.2 The Medium and the Time Structure of the Design Process.

4.2.1 Differance: The Productive Vagueness of the Medium.

4.2.2 The Diagram.

4.2.3 Specious vs Point–like Time: The Time Structure of the Architectural Project.

5 The Societal Function of Architecture.

5.1 Architecture as Societal Function System.

5.1.1 Function vs Service.

5.1.2 Function Systems and the Functional Exigencies of Society.

5.1.3 Framing as Societal Function of Architecture.

5.1.4 The Definition of the Situation as Precondition of Social Interaction.

5.1.5 Framing Double Contingency.

5.1.6 Double Contingency Radicalized.

5.1.7 The relationship between Art and Architecture in terms of their Societal Function.

5.2 Innovation as Crucial Aspect of Architecture′s Societal Function.

5.2.1 The Burden and Risk of Permanent Innovation.

5.2.2 The Innovative Capacity of Architecture′s Operations and Structures.

5.2.3 Variation, Redundancy and Adaptive Pertinence.

5.3 Strategies and Techniques of Innovation.

5.3.1 The Power of Abstraction.

5.3.2 The history of Architectural Innovations.

5.3.3 Conceptual Manoeuvres.

5.4 Key Innovations: Place, Space, Field.

5.4.1 The Emergence of Architectural Space.

5.4.2 The Hegemony of Architectural Space.

5.4.3 The Transcendence of Architectural Space.

5.4.4 From Space to Field.

Concluding Remarks.

Appendix 1: ComparativeMatrix of Societal Function Systems.

Appendix 2: Theses 1 24.

References.

Index.

Picture Credits.

O autorze

Patrik Schumacher is partner at Zaha Hadid Architects and founding director of the Design Research Laboratory (DRL) at the Architectural Association (AA) in London. He studied philosophy and architecture in Bonn, London and Stuttgart, where he received his architectural Diploma in 1990. In 1996 he founded the AADRL with Brett Steele, and continues to serve as one of its directors. In 1999 he completed his PhD at the Institute for Cultural Science, Klagenfurt University. Patrik Schumacher joined Zaha Hadid in 1988. Since then Zaha Hadid Architects has expanded from a small studio to a global firm employing over 300 architects. Patrik Schumacher′s career continues to integrate practice and theory. His contribution to the discourse of contemporary architecture is also evident in his prior writings, such as Digital Hadid, 2004, as well as in his curatorial work for exhibitions, such as Latent Utopias, Graz, 2002. His essays are available on www.patrikschumacher.com.

Blurb

By presenting architecture as a discipline with its own unique logic, The Autopoiesis of Architecture provides a wholly new theoretical approach to architecture. The impact of this is far reaching. Architecture′s conception of itself is addressed but also that of its development within wider contemporary society. Schumacher′s innovative treatment of the subject enriches architectural theory with a coordinated arsenal of concepts that facilitates both detailed analysis and insightful comparisons with other domains, such as art, science and politics. The Autopoiesis′ of the title refers to self–production: the term having first been introduced in biology to describe the essential characteristic of life as a circular organization that reproduces all its specific components out of its own life process. Once transposed into the theory of social systems, autopoiesis came to be understood as a system of communication capable of producing all its specific communication structures within their own internal process. It is this autopoietic system of communication that is being applied here to an architectural context. Architecture comprises various modes of communication, including drawings, texts and built works. These communications depend upon each other and combine to reproduce architecture as a specialized system of communication. The book explores how this system of communication forms a unique subsystem of society that co–evolves with other important autopoietic subsystems like art, science, politics and the economy.

The first of two volumes that together present a comprehensive account of architecture′s autopoiesis, The Autopoiesis of Architecture: A New Framework for Architecture introduces the theoretical framework and traces the historical process of architecture′s differentiation within its societal environment: its elevation above the craft of building, its emancipation from religion and politics, as well as its separation from art and science. On this basis Schumacher insists on the necessity of maintaining disciplinary autonomy and argues for its distinct demarcation in relation to art and engineering. Architecture′s theory dependency is emphasized and its internal separation into the avant–garde and the mainstream is explained. Styles are theorized as design research programmes that constitute architectural history as a progression of cycles of innovation that upgrade architecture to adapt to the ongoing evolution of society. This initial volume ends with the clarification of architecture′s underlying societal function and raison d′être. The second volume completes the analysis of the discourse and further proposes a new agenda for contemporary architecture in response to the challenges and opportunities that confront architectural design within the context of current societal and technological developments.