Deadly Diplomacy: How the UN destroyed Bosnia

ISBN-13: 9781530815272 / Angielski / Miękka / 2016 / 440 str.

Andrew M. Patterson

Opis

This is a documentary taken from television, radio, and short wave news broadcasts and the internet about the Bosnian Conflict and how the UN was used to destroy Bosnia. There were 19 sources with the best news reports coming from short wave broadcasts from Radio Netherland where its broadcasts were jammed by Belgrade and Serb radio would broadcast on Radio Netherlands frequency to silence the truth about the war. Marshal Tito had reformed Yugoslavia into a Yugoslav Federation of six republics to control the aggressive nationalism of Serbs as he was Croatian and knew the history of Serb aggressiveness, the only nation that historically controlled both sides of the Danube River after Austria. With the break-up of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1990, the Russian military began to plot the re-making of the Soviet Union and needed a united and strong Yugoslavia to menace the right flank of NATO which would have to be through Poland. This was also the reason Yugoslavia was used by the British to menace Hitler's planned invasion of Russia set for May 1, 1941. The Germans called on the Croats to take over Belgrade but the British ordered the Serbs to take over Belgrade, kick out King Paul and put in 18 year old King Peter who immediately declared war on Germany. So with only 80 billion Deutschmarks Chancellor Kohl paid the Russians to leave East Germany, the new independence of Bosnia had to be crushed quickly and massacres and violence were the modus operandi of the Serbs who were also added by volunteers from Greece, Macedonia, and Russia. The Russians involved in the massacres were also involved in creating the breakaway Donbas of the Ukraine. but in 1991, the Ukraine and Poland were aware of the danger Russia posed while ignorance of State Department, CIA, and George H.W, Bush and Clinton White House had no one capable of knowing what was happening with the lie that Bosnia was attempting to create and Islamic state in Europe. Wrong, as Bosnians believed they could show multi-cultures could live at peace in Bosnia which was chosen as the host for the Olympic Winter Games of 1988. They would show that Bosnia would be like Switzerland that had 500 years of peace with four languages and the conflict between Protestantism, Catholicism, and Orthodox Church that marred the peace of Europe for centuries. Another factor was its lack of knowledge of western languages. Germany took in 300,000 Bosnian refugees and many learned German. The commander of NATO was German but rotating the top position among all NAtO members did not guarantee solidarity especially as Britain and France both had ties to the Serbs from the 1914 Secret Treaty of London which was attended by Russia, Britain, France, Serbia, and Greece that they were mutually bound together for defense. And so there is the Statement by British Prime Minister John Majors that if he lifted the arms embargo placed on Bosnia, his government would fall. This is shown by the Brig General Michael Rose who brought some peace and then called to London, made a knight by the House of Lords and then supporting the Serbs and massacres began again. The massacres and bombardments were to make Bosnians cry for peace and Radovan Karadzic, Ratko Mladic, and the psychopath Arkan and others like him were financed by Milosevic in Belgrade with Deutschmarks the Russian military sent him. State Department, two presidents, the CIA, and the "think Tanks" like Brookings, Hudson Institute, Rockefeller Foundation was gave out the most useless advice like the UN Security Council and International Contact Group. Mitterrand of France was dying of cancer and Edouard Balladur, a Christian Iranian who became a French citizen but with a strong contempt for Muslims and hatred of Muslims. After Jacques Chirac defeated Balladur his suppression of crimes committed by Serbs against French peacekeepers was revealed. Richard Holbrooke tricked Bosnians into a peace that does not work.

Zawartość książki może nie spełniać oczekiwań – reklamacje nie obejmują treści, która mogła nie być redakcyjnie ani merytorycznie opracowana.